Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;147(6):659-666.
doi: 10.1017/S0031182020000189. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

Ascarids exposed: a method for in vitro drug exposure and gene expression analysis of anthelmintic naïve Parascaris spp

Affiliations

Ascarids exposed: a method for in vitro drug exposure and gene expression analysis of anthelmintic naïve Parascaris spp

J A Scare et al. Parasitology. 2020 May.

Abstract

Ascarid parasites infect a variety of hosts and regular anthelmintic treatment is recommended for all species. Parascaris spp. is the only ascarid species with widespread anthelmintic resistance, which allows for the study of resistance mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to establish an in vitro drug exposure protocol for adult anthelmintic-naïve Parascaris spp. and report a preliminary transcriptomic analysis in response to drug exposure. Live worms were harvested from foal necropsies and maintained in RPMI-1640 at 37 °C. Serial dilutions of oxibendazole (OBZ) and ivermectin (IVM) were prepared for in vitro drug exposure, and worm viability was monitored over time. In a second drug trial, worms were used for transcriptomic analysis. The final drug concentrations employed were OBZ at 40.1 μm (10 μg mL-1) and IVM at 1.1 μm (1 μg mL-1) for 24 and 3 h, respectively. The RNA-seq analysis revealed numerous differentially expressed genes, with some being potentially related to drug detoxification and regulatory mechanisms. This report provides a method for in vitro drug exposure and the phenotypic responses for Parascaris spp., which could be extrapolated to other ascarid parasites. Finally, it also provides preliminary transcriptomic data following drug exposure as a reference point for future studies of Parascaris spp.

Keywords: Anthelmintic; Parascaris; ascarid; in vitro; transcriptome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
An illustration of the study design (IVM, ivermectin; OBZ, oxibendazole).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
A graphical representation of mean worm viability following in vitro anthelmintic exposure. Control worms were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium only or with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) which was used to prepare the anthelmintics. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (α = 0.05).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
A graphical representation of mean worm viability of worms used in Part 2 of this study, where those exposed to oxibendazole (OBZ) at 40.1 μm (10 μg mL−1) for 24 h and ivermectin (IVM) at 1.1 μm (1 μg mL−1) for 3 h were used for RNA-sequencing analysis. Control worms were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium only or with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) which was used to prepare the anthelmintics. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (α = 0.05).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
A graphical representation of select genes from the RNA-seq analysis performed in Part 2 of this study. The housekeeping genes are ama and ncbp. (A) In vitro vs in situ controls, (B) all control worms vs all treated worms, where the selected genes had significantly higher expression in the treated worms (α = 0.01), (C) ivermectin (IVM) treated with 1.1 μm (1 μg mL−1), IVM control, oxibendazole (OBZ) treated with 40.1 μm (10 μg mL−1), and OBZ control.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
A graphical representation of the gene ontology pathway analysis for significantly different genes (SDGs) between groups. From left to right: all genes, all treated worms vs all control worms, ivermectin (IVM) treated with 1.1 μm (1 μg mL−1) vs IVM control, oxibendazole (OBZ) treated with 40.1 μm (10 μg mL−1) vs OBZ control. The top row reflects biological processes (BP) and the bottom row reflects molecular functions (MF).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Armstrong SK, Woodgate RG, Gough S, Heller J, Sangster NC and Hughes KJ (2014) The efficacy of ivermectin, pyrantel and fenbendazole against Parascaris equorum infection in foals on farms in Australia. Veterinary Parasitology 205, 575–580. - PubMed
    1. Beech RN, Skuce P, Bartley DJ, Martin RJ, Prichard RK and Gilleard JS (2011) Anthelmintic resistance: markers for resistance, or susceptibility? Parasitology 138, 160–174. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chelladurai JJ and Brewer MT (2019) Detection and quantification of Parascaris P-glycoprotein drug transporter expression with a novel mRNA hybridization technique. Veterinary Parasitology 267, 75–83. - PubMed
    1. Cvilink V, Lamka J and Skálová L (2009) Xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes and metabolism of anthelmintics in helminths. Drug Metabolism Reviews 41, 8–26. - PubMed
    1. Feyereisen R (1999) Insect P450 enzymes. Annual Review of Entomology 44, 507–533. - PubMed

Publication types