Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Dec;10(4):385-394.
doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002163. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

Placebo response in trials of drug treatments for cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Placebo response in trials of drug treatments for cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

Rocio Roji et al. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most distressing symptoms experienced by patients. There is no gold standard treatment, although multiple drugs have been tested with little evidence of efficacy. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of these drugs have commented on the existence or size of the placebo response (PR). The objective of this systematic review was to establish the magnitude of the PR in RCTs of drugs to relieve CRF and to identify contributing factors.

Method: RCTs were included in which the objective was to treat CRF. A meta-analysis was conducted using the standardised mean change (SMC) between baseline and final measurement in the placebo group. To explore factors that may be associated with the PR (eg, population or drug), a meta-regression was undertaken. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane tool.

Results: From 3916 citations, 30 relevant RCTs were identified. All had limitations that increased their risk of bias. The pooled SMC in reduction in fatigue status in placebo groups was -0.23 (95% confidence intervals -0.42 to -0.04). None of the variables analysed in the meta-regression were statistically significant related to PR.

Conclusion: There is some evidence, based on trials with small samples, that the PR in trials testing drugs for CRF is non-trivial in size and statistically significant. We recommend that researchers planning drug studies in CRF should consider implementing alternative trial designs to better account for PR and decrease impact on the study results.

Keywords: cancer; fatigue; methodological research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of random effect model standardised mean change fatigue in placebo arm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cho HJ, Hotopf M, Wessely S. The placebo response in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosom Med 2005;67:301–13. 10.1097/01.psy.0000156969.76986.e0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Papakostas GI, Fava M. Does the probability of receiving placebo influence clinical trial outcome? A meta-regression of double-blind, randomized clinical trials in MDD. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2009;19:34–40. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.08.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Furukawa TA, Cipriani A, Atkinson LZ, et al. . Placebo response rates in antidepressant trials: a systematic review of published and unpublished double-blind randomised controlled studies. Lancet Psychiatry 2016;3:1059–66. 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30307-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sanderson C, Hardy J, Spruyt O, et al. . Placebo and nocebo effects in randomized controlled trials: the implications for research and practice. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013;46:722–30. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.12.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agid O, Siu CO, Potkin SG, et al. . Meta-Regression analysis of placebo response in antipsychotic trials, 1970–2010. Am J Psychiatry 2013;170:1335–44. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12030315 - DOI - PubMed