Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 15;26(12):2783-2788.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2612. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

What Is the Real Impact of Estrogen Receptor Status on the Prognosis and Treatment of HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer?

Affiliations

What Is the Real Impact of Estrogen Receptor Status on the Prognosis and Treatment of HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer?

Mariana Brandão et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

HER2+ early breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, comprising all the intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. The only biomarker available nowadays for anti-HER2 treatment selection is HER2 status itself, but estrogen receptor (ER) status is emerging as a robust predictive marker within HER2+ disease. In this Perspective, we discuss the biological and clinical differences between patients with HER2+/ER-positive (ER+) disease versus those with HER2+/ER-negative (ER-neg) tumors, namely, short-term and long-term (>5 years after diagnosis) prognosis, response to neoadjuvant treatment and benefit from adjuvant anti-HER2-targeted therapies. We also address other possible biomarkers to be used for patient selection in future clinical trials, such as gene signatures, PAM50 subtypes, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, PIK3CA mutations, and changes in Ki67 score during treatment and discuss their limitations. Finally, we suggest new clinical trial designs that can have an impact on clinical practice, aiming to test treatment deescalation separately for patients with HER2+/ER+ and HER2+/ER-neg tumors. We also propose an integrated classification of HER2+ disease, comprising DNA, RNA, protein expression, and microenvironment characteristics, in order to identify those tumors that are truly "HER2-addicted" and may benefit the most from anti-HER2 treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement

MB: travel grant and speaker honoraria from Roche/GNE. RC: speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca and Janssen; travel grants from AstraZeneca and Pfizer. LM: advisory board for Pfizer and AstraZeneca; research grant from Pfizer. AP: part of an advisory board for NanoString Technologies; research grant from NanoString Technologies. LC: no conflict of interest. MP: consultancy for AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Odonate, Pfizer, Roche/GNE, Camel-IDS, Crescendo Biologics, Periphagen, Huya, Debiopharm, PharmaMar, G1 Therapeutics, Menarini, Seattle Genetics, Immunomedics, and Oncoloytics; board member of Radius. MB, RC and MP: research grants to their Institut: from Roche/GNE, Radius, AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, GSJ/Novartis, Synthon, Servier, and Pfizer.

Figures

Figure 1 –
Figure 1 –. Current and future classification of HER2+ disease.
Legend: HER2+ tumors can be divided between estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative subgroups, according to the immunohistochemical expression of ER. Yet, at the molecular level, these tumors can be divided into the four molecular subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched and basal-like), showing different molecular alterations, cell pathways activation and immune microenvironment. This leads to different responses to anti-HER2 treatment, as well to chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. ER: estrogen receptor; HER2-E: HER2-enriched molecular subtype; LumA: luminal A molecular subtype; LumB: luminal B molecular subtype; mut: mutation; TILs: tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; WT: wild-type.
Figure 2 –
Figure 2 –. Combining biomarkers in HER2+ disease.
Currently, protein expression assessed by immunohistochemistry is the standard method to classify breast cancer into different subtypes, according to tumor’s HER2 and estrogen receptors expression. However, an integrated classification of HER2-positive breast tumors, based on their DNA, RNA, protein expression, and microenvironment is needed to implement more precise and guided treatments and to identify those tumors “addicted” to the HER2 cellular pathway. Here, we propose a definition of “HER2-addicted” tumors that can be further refined in the future, as more data become available. ER: estrogen receptor; HER2-E: HER2-enriched molecular subtype; PR: progesterone receptor; Rbsig: RB loss of function signature; WT: wild-type.

References

    1. Ferrari A, Vincent-Salomon A, Pivot X, Sertier A-S, Thomas E, Tonon L, et al. A whole-genome sequence and transcriptome perspective on HER2-positive breast cancers. Nat Commun 2016;7:12222. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prat A, Carey LA, Adamo B, Vidal M, Tabernero J, Cortés J, et al. Molecular features and survival outcomes of the intrinsic subtypes within HER2-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gingras I, Gebhart G, de Azambuja E, Piccart-Gebhart M. HER2-positive breast cancer is lost in translation: time for patient-centered research. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017;14:669–81. - PubMed
    1. Giuliano M, Trivedi MV, Schiff R. Bidirectional Crosstalk between the Estrogen Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Signaling Pathways in Breast Cancer: Molecular Basis and Clinical Implications. Breast Care 2013;8:256–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang Y-C, Morrison G, Gillihan R, Guo J, Ward RM, Fu X, et al. Different mechanisms for resistance to trastuzumab versus lapatinib in HER2- positive breast cancers - role of estrogen receptor and HER2 reactivation. Breast Cancer Res 2011;13:R121. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms