Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Feb 10;10(2):e032640.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032640.

Proximal Femoral Nail Unlocked versus Locked (ProFNUL): a protocol for a multicentre, parallel-armed randomised controlled trial for the effect of femoral nail mode of lag screw locking and screw configuration in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Proximal Femoral Nail Unlocked versus Locked (ProFNUL): a protocol for a multicentre, parallel-armed randomised controlled trial for the effect of femoral nail mode of lag screw locking and screw configuration in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures

Arjun Sivakumar et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Intertrochanteric fractures are common fragility injuries in the elderly. Surgical fixation using intramedullary devices are one of the widely used management options. To date, evidence demonstrating the effects of lag screw configuration and the mode of lag screw locking in these devices is lacking. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the lag screw configuration (single vs integrated dual interlocking screw) and the mode of lag screw locking (static vs dynamic) of a femoral nail device result in differences in clinical and functional outcomes.

Methods and analysis: A multicentre, pragmatic, single-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a three-arm parallel group design is proposed. Nine-hundred patients with intertrochanteric fractures (A1 and A2 AO/OTA) will be randomised to fracture treatment using a Gamma3 nail (Stryker; proximally dynamic) or a Trigen Intertan nail (Smith & Nephew) in a dynamic or static lag screw configuration. The primary outcome measure consists of radiological evidence of construct failure within 6 months following surgery, with failure being defined as breakage of the femoral nail or distal locking screw, a change in tip-apex distance of more than 10 mm or lag screw cut-out through the femoral head. Secondary outcomes include surgical data (operation time, fluoroscopy time), complications (surgical site infection, reoperation, patient death), return to mobility and home circumstances, functional independence, function and pain. Patients who are able to walk independently with or without a mobility aid and are able to answer simple questions and follow instructions will be asked to participate in three dimensional gait analysis at 6 weeks and 6 months to assess hip biomechanics from this cohort. Additional secondary measures of gait speed, hip range of motion, joint contact and muscle forces and gross activity monitoring patterns will be obtained in this subgroup.

Ethics and dissemination: The Central Adelaide Local Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the protocol for this RCT (HREC/17/RAH/433). The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at relevant conferences.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12618001431213.

Keywords: clinical trials; fracture fixation; hip; intramedullary nailing; orthopaedic & trauma surgery; trauma management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: IP is owned by the Royal Adelaide Hospital/University of Adelaide.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow diagram. 3D, three dimensional; AP, anteroposterior; FIM, functional independence measure; HHS, harris hip score; VAS, visual analogue scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boulton C, Bunning T, Johansen A, et al. National hip fracture database: annual report 2017. United Kingdom, 2017.
    1. Butt FF, Hussain AS, Khan AM, et al. Implants for extracapsular neck of femur fracture dynamic hip screw versus intramedullary nailing. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2017;29:697–701. - PubMed
    1. Harvey N, McCloskey E. Gaps and solutions in bone health: a global framework for improvement. International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), 2016.
    1. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:897–902. 10.1007/s00198-004-1627-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kanis JA, Odén A, McCloskey EV, et al. A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int 2012;23:2239–56. 10.1007/s00198-012-1964-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types