Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 10;10(2):e036758.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036758.

Protocol of a natural experiment to evaluate a supermarket intervention to improve food purchasing and dietary behaviours of women (WRAPPED study) in England: a prospective matched controlled cluster design

Affiliations

Protocol of a natural experiment to evaluate a supermarket intervention to improve food purchasing and dietary behaviours of women (WRAPPED study) in England: a prospective matched controlled cluster design

Christina Vogel et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Poor diet is a leading risk factor for non-communicable diseases and costs the National Health Service £5.8 billion annually. Product placement strategies used extensively in food outlets, like supermarkets, can influence customers' preferences. Policy-makers, including the UK Government, are considering legislation to ensure placement strategies promote healthier food purchasing and dietary habits. High-quality scientific evidence is needed to inform future policy action. This study will assess whether healthier placement strategies in supermarkets improve household purchasing patterns and the diets of more than one household member.

Methods and analyses: This natural experiment, with a prospective matched controlled cluster design, is set in discount supermarkets across England. The primary objective is to investigate whether enhanced placement of fresh fruit and vegetables improves household-level purchasing of these products after 6 months. Secondary objectives will examine: (1) differences in intervention effects on purchasing by level of educational attainment, (2) intervention effects on the dietary quality of women and their young children, (3) intervention effects on store-level sales of fruit and vegetables and (4) cost-effectiveness of the intervention from individual, retailer and societal perspectives. Up to 810 intervention and 810 control participants will be recruited from 18 intervention and 18 matched control stores. Eligible participants will be women aged 18-45 years, who hold a loyalty card and shop in a study store. Each control store will be matched to an intervention store on: (1) sales profile, (2) neighbourhood deprivation and (3) customer profile. A detailed process evaluation will assess intervention implementation, mechanisms of impact and, social and environmental contexts.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (ID 20986.A5). Primary, secondary and process evaluation results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and shared with policy-makers.

Trial registration number: NCT03573973; Pre-results.

Keywords: health economics; nutrition & dietetics; preventive medicine; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: This study involves a non-financial collaboration with Iceland Foods. CV, SC, PD, CS, JC, GM, JL and KB have no conflicts of interests to declare and no further financial disclosures to make. JB and WL have received grant research support from Danone Nutricia Early Life Nutrition. CC has received consultancy, lecture fees and honoraria from AMGEN, GSK, Alliance for Better Bone Health, MSD, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Servier, Medtronic and Roche. The study described in this manuscript is not related to these relationships.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart for the Women’s Responses to Adjusted Product Placement and its Effects on Diet study. F&V, fruit and vegetables.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Logic model for the Women’s Responses to Adjusted Product Placement and its Effects on Diet study. PPI, patient and public involvement. F&V, fruit and vegetables.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay KA, et al. . Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet 2019;393:1958–72. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scarborough P, Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe KK, et al. . The economic burden of ill health due to diet, physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol and obesity in the UK: an update to 2006-07 NHS costs. J Public Health 2011;33:527–35. 10.1093/pubmed/fdr033 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bates B, Collins D, Cox L, et al. . National diet and nutrition survey, years 1 to 9 of the rolling programme (2008/2009 – 2016/2017): time trend and income analyses. London, 2019.
    1. Food Standards Agency The 2014 food and you survey. London, 2014.
    1. Barker DJP. Nutrition in the womb: how better nutrition during development will prevent heart disease, diabetes and stroke. 1st ed USA, 2008.

Publication types

Associated data