Australian consensus statements for the regulation, production and use of faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice
- PMID: 32047093
- DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320260
Australian consensus statements for the regulation, production and use of faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice
Abstract
Objective: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has proved to be an extremely effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection, and there is interest in its potential application in other gastrointestinal and systemic diseases. However, the recent death and episode of septicaemia following FMT highlights the need for further appraisal and guidelines on donor evaluation, production standards, treatment facilities and acceptable clinical indications.
Design: For these consensus statements, a 24-member multidisciplinary working group voted online and then convened in-person, using a modified Delphi approach to formulate and refine a series of recommendations based on best evidence and expert opinion. Invitations to participate were directed to Australian experts, with an international delegate assisting the development. The following issues regarding the use of FMT in clinical practice were addressed: donor selection and screening, clinical indications, requirements of FMT centres and future directions. Evidence was rated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system.
Results: Consensus was reached on 27 statements to provide guidance on best practice in FMT. These include: (1) minimum standards for donor screening with recommended clinical selection criteria, blood and stool testing; (2) accepted routes of administration; (3) clinical indications; (4) minimum standards for FMT production and requirements for treatment facilities acknowledging distinction between single-site centres (eg, hospital-based) and stool banks; and (5) recommendations on future research and product development.
Conclusions: These FMT consensus statements provide comprehensive recommendations around the production and use of FMT in clinical practice with relevance to clinicians, researchers and policy makers.
Keywords: Clostridioides difficile; FMT; faecal microbiota transplantation; inflammatory bowel disease; microbiome therapeutics; stool bank.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: CRK has received research support and is a site investigator for Finch Therapeutics; and is a clinical advisory board member for Openbiome. SP is a consultant for Finch Therapeutics and received speaker fees from Ferring, Janssen. TJB has interest in Redhill Biopharma, Salix and Finch Therapeutics, ResMed and GSK; has interest in the Centre for Digestive Diseases, where faecal microbiota transplantation is a treatment option for patients, and has patents in this field. MK has received speaker fees, research funding, educational support or honoraria for advisory board participation from Ferring, AbbVie, Janssen, Takeda and received research support from AbbVie. SPC has received speaker fees from Shire, Ferring, Microbiotica, Pfizer and Janssen; and is a shareholder in BiomeBank. JMA has received speaker fees, research funding, educational support or honoraria for advisory board participation from Abbott, AbbVie, Allergan, Anatara, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celegene, Ferring, Gilead, Hospira, Immuninc, ImmunsanT, Janssen, MSD, Nestle, Progenity, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda, Vifor, Royal Adelaide Research Fund and The Hospital Research Fund. JB has received speaker fees, research funding, educational support or honoraria for advisory board participation from Janssen, Takeda, AbbVie, Celgene, Ferring, Pfizer, Anatara, Microba, Shire and Progenity. SC has received speaker fees, research funding, educational support or honoraria for advisory board participation from AbbVie, Aspen/Orphan, Celgene, Ferring, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda and Vifor. SG has received speaker fees, research funding, educational support or honoraria for advisory board participation from Janssen Cilag, Shire, Takeda, Ferring and Pfizer and AbbVie. DAL has received speaker fees, research funding, educational support or honoraria for advisory board participation from Nutricia, Nestle, Janssen, AbbVie. RP has received speaker fees or research support from Janssen, Aspen, Pfizer, Abbvie and Takeda. RWL reports advisory board fees from AbbVie, Aspen, Celgene, Ferring, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda; research fees from Gastrointestinal Society of Australia (GESA), Endochoice, Janssen, National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Shire, and Takeda; and speaker fees from Emerge Health, Ferring, Janssen, Shire, and Takeda.
Similar articles
-
International consensus conference on stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice.Gut. 2019 Dec;68(12):2111-2121. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319548. Epub 2019 Sep 28. Gut. 2019. PMID: 31563878 Free PMC article. Review.
-
European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice.Gut. 2017 Apr;66(4):569-580. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313017. Epub 2017 Jan 13. Gut. 2017. PMID: 28087657 Free PMC article.
-
[Reconsidering the technical aspects and quality management background of faecal microbiota transplantation due to the novel coronavirus pandemic].Orv Hetil. 2020 Nov 1;161(44):1858-1871. doi: 10.1556/650.2020.32023. Print 2020 Nov 1. Orv Hetil. 2020. PMID: 33130602 Hungarian.
-
Fecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection in Taiwan: Establishment and implementation.J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2019 Dec;52(6):841-850. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Sep 30. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2019. PMID: 31607571 Review.
-
A comprehensive approach to stool donor screening for faecal microbiota transplantation in China.Microb Cell Fact. 2021 Nov 27;20(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12934-021-01705-0. Microb Cell Fact. 2021. PMID: 34838016 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Efficacy of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for the Treatment of Autism in Children: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2023 Feb 9;2023:5993628. doi: 10.1155/2023/5993628. eCollection 2023. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2023. PMID: 36818228 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation on ulcerative colitis and its effect on gastrointestinal motility and immune function.Am J Transl Res. 2021 Dec 15;13(12):14057-14066. eCollection 2021. Am J Transl Res. 2021. PMID: 35035748 Free PMC article.
-
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Is Effective for the Treatment of Partially Treated Clostridioides difficile Infection.Gut Liver. 2021 Jan 15;15(1):1-2. doi: 10.5009/gnl20368. Gut Liver. 2021. PMID: 33443235 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Outcomes of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridioides difficile Infection in South Australia.Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 13;12(4):ofaf149. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf149. eCollection 2025 Apr. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025. PMID: 40160347 Free PMC article.
-
Prolonged effect of antibiotic therapy on the gut microbiota composition, functionality, and antibiotic resistance genes' profiles in healthy stool donors.Front Microbiol. 2025 May 9;16:1589704. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1589704. eCollection 2025. Front Microbiol. 2025. PMID: 40415928 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical