Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;7(21):605.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.62.

The effect of biofeedback training on intestinal function among patients with middle and low rectal cancer: a randomized controlled study

Affiliations

The effect of biofeedback training on intestinal function among patients with middle and low rectal cancer: a randomized controlled study

Li Liu et al. Ann Transl Med. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the effect of biofeedback on intestinal function among patients with middle and low rectal cancer.

Methods: Using a randomized controlled trial design, 109 patients with middle and low rectal cancer indicated to have preoperative radiochemotherapy, anterior resection of the rectum, and preventive stoma were randomly divided into three groups: the blank control group, the pelvic floor muscle exercise group, and the biofeedback training group. A 16-month intervention and longitudinal follow-up study was conducted, and a questionnaire on intestinal function by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) was adopted into a Chinese version to evaluate patients' intestinal function situation.

Results: The intestinal function of the biofeedback training group was better than the blank control group and pelvic floor muscle exercise group. The total score of intestinal function and the scores of each dimension were statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Biofeedback training could significantly improve the intestinal function of patients with middle and low rectal cancer, promote its recovery, and is thus worthy of clinical application.

Keywords: Biofeedback; ileostomy; intestinal function; rectal neoplasms; sphincter preservation operation (SPO).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the design.

Comment in

References

    1. Sun KX, Zheng RS, Zhang SW, et al. Report of Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Different Areas of China, 2015. China Cancer 2019;28:1-11.
    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:87-108. 10.3322/caac.21262 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim YA, Lee GJ, Park SW, et al. Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors Associated With the Nonreversal Ileostomy Following Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer. Ann Coloproctol 2015;31:98-102. 10.3393/ac.2015.31.3.98 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Du D, Su Z, Wang D, et al. Optimal Interval to Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2018;17:13-24. 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.10.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dulskas A, Miliauskas P, Tikuisis R, et al. The functional results of radical rectal cancer surgery: review of the literature. Acta Chir Belg 2016;116:1-10. 10.1080/00015458.2015.1136482 - DOI - PubMed