The presence of microvascular invasion guides treatment strategy in recurrent HBV-related HCC
- PMID: 32048035
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06640-8
The presence of microvascular invasion guides treatment strategy in recurrent HBV-related HCC
Abstract
Objectives: We used the status of microvascular invasion (MVI) at primary resection to help treatment selection for hepatitis B virus-positive (HBV+) recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) patients in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B-C.
Methods: From 2009 to 2017, we enrolled 221 consecutive HBV+ rHCC patients at BCLC stage B-C who underwent re-resection (RR), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Post recurrence survival (PRS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between RR/RFA and TACE according to MVI status. A one-to-one propensity score matching analysis was performed.
Results: For MVI(-) patients, the median PRS was 62.3 months for the RR/RFA group and 21.1 months for the TACE group (p = 0.039). The corresponding OS was 71.4 months and 26.6 months, respectively (p = 0.010). For MVI(+) patients, the median PRS in the RR/RFA group and TACE group was 14.7 months and 10.1 months (p = 0.115). The corresponding OS was 23.4 months and 16.4 months, respectively (p = 0.067). After matching, the dominance of RR/RFA over TACE remained in MVI(-) patients for both PRS (62.3 months vs 15.3 months, p = 0.019) and OS (98.1 months vs 33.4 months, p = 0.046). No significant difference was found in MVI(+) patients for either PRS (14.7 months vs 11.8 months, p = 0.593) or OS (23.4 months vs 28.1 months, p = 0.662).
Conclusions: MVI status definitely helps select treatment options in HBV+ rHCC patients. For MVI(-) patients, RR/RFA provided better survival than TACE while for MVI(+) patients, TACE shared similar survival outcomes.
Key points: • This study aimed at the determination of the optimal treatment options (ablation /resection vs TACE) in case of recurrent HBV-related HCC. • It showed that MVI status, established at primary resection of HCC, was a powerful marker for selecting the best treatment option in these patients. • In MVI(-) patients, RR/RFA achieved a better survival than TACE. In MVI(+) patients, TACE shared similar survival.
Keywords: Carcinoma, hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, therapeutic; Hepatectomy; Radiofrequency ablation; Recurrence.
References
-
- Koh PS, Chan ACY, Cheung TT et al (2016) Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation compared with transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative survival analysis. HPB (Oxford) 18:72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2015.07.005 - DOI
-
- Dai WC, Cheung TT (2016) Strategic overview on the best treatment option for intrahepaitc hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 16:1063–1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2016.1226136 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Joliat G-R, Allemann P, Labgaa I et al (2017) Treatment and outcomes of recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1582-9 - DOI
-
- Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Tanaka E et al (2003) Risk factors contributing to early and late phase intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. J Hepatol 38:200–207 - DOI
-
- Tung-Ping Poon R, Fan ST, Wong J (2000) Risk factors, prevention, and management of postoperative recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 232:10–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200007000-00003 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- 81770608/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- 81801703/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- 81825013/National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars
- 2018A030310282/Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
- -/National high level talents special support plan--Ten thousand plan--Young top-notch talent support program
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
