Chinese herbal preparations for chronic heart failure: Study protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- PMID: 32049792
- PMCID: PMC7035053
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018966
Chinese herbal preparations for chronic heart failure: Study protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Abstract
Background: Chinese herbal preparations (CHPs) have been reported to be effective in the management of chronic heart failure (CHF); they are beneficial in improving cardiac function, reducing hospital stays and readmission. However, the credibility of their effectiveness evidence has not been evaluated. We aim to summarize and evaluate current effectiveness evidence of traditional Chinese medicine in the management of CHF.
Methods: We will search PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systemic Review (CDSR), and Web of Science from inception to December 2019 for systematic reviews that assessing the effectiveness of CHPs for CHF. The search will be performed without language restriction. Experimental interventions will include any type of CHPs, and control interventions will include placebo, sham interventions, usual care, or no controls. The primary outcome will be the changes in heart function classification defined by the New York Heart Association. Secondary outcomes include left ventricular ejection fraction, Six Minute Walk Test, other efficacy outcomes, and adverse events. We will use I statistics to assess the between-study heterogeneity in each meta-analysis, Eager test to detect publication bias, and the ratio of observed versus expected number of trials with positive findings. We will summarize the evidence and classify them into convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, or weak.
Results: The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Ethics and dissemination: No ethical approval and patient consent are required since this study data is based on published literature. The results of the study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.
Protocol registration number: PROSPERO CRD 42019139649 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#joinuppage).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
-
- Spannheimer A, Müller K, Falkenstein P, et al. Long-term diuretic treatment in heart failure: are there differences between furosemide and torasemide? Comparative Study Praxis (Bern 1994) 2002;91:1467–75. - PubMed
-
- Ewen S, Nikolovska A, Zivanovic I, et al. Chronic Heart Failure - New InsightsReview Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2016;141:1560–4. - PubMed
-
- Harjola VP, Mullens W, Banaszewski M, et al. Organ dysfunction, injury and failure in acute heart failure: from pathophysiology to diagnosis and management. A review on behalf of the Acute Heart Failure. Committee of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur J Heart Fail 2017;19:821–36. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Tromp J, Tay WT, Ouwerkerk W, et al. Multimorbidity in patients with heart failure from 11 Asian regions: a prospective cohort study using the ASIAN-HF registry. PLoS Med 2018;15:e1002541.[Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) are commonly used for the treatment of heart failure in China. Due to the variety of CHIs used in clinic, selecting a suitable CHI for patients with heart failure is vital. This study aims to assess and compare the effect of different CHIs for heart failure using umbrella systematic review]. - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical