Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Mar;58(3):248-256.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001270.

Risk of Frequent Emergency Department Use Among an Ambulatory Care Sensitive Condition Population: A Population-based Cohort Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Risk of Frequent Emergency Department Use Among an Ambulatory Care Sensitive Condition Population: A Population-based Cohort Study

Catherine Hudon et al. Med Care. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Background: A small fraction of patients use a disproportionately large amount of emergency department (ED) resources. Identifying these patients, especially those with ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC), would allow health care professionals to enhance their outpatient care.

Objective: The objectives of the study were to determine predictive factors associated with frequent ED use in a Quebec adult population with ACSCs and to compare several models predicting the risk of becoming an ED frequent user following an ED visit.

Research design: This was an observational population-based cohort study extracted from Quebec's administrative data.

Subjects: The cohort included 451,775 adult patients, living in nonremote areas, with an ED visit between January 2012 and December 2013 (index visit), and previously diagnosed with an ACSC but not dementia.

Measures: The outcome was frequent ED use (≥4 visits) during the year following the index visit. Predictors included sociodemographics, physical and mental comorbidities, and prior use of health services. We developed several logistic models (with different sets of predictors) on a derivation cohort (2012 cohort) and tested them on a validation cohort (2013 cohort).

Results: Frequent ED users represented 5% of the cohort and accounted for 36% of all ED visits. A simple 2-variable prediction model incorporating history of hospitalization and number of previous ED use accurately predicted future frequent ED use. The full model with all sets of predictors performed only slightly better than the simple model (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.786 vs. 0.759, respectively; similar positive predictive value and number needed to evaluate curves).

Conclusions: The ability to identify frequent ED users based only on previous ED and hospitalization use provides an opportunity to rapidly target this population for appropriate interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Medical Council of Canada. Report of the Incidence and Prevalence of Diseases and Other Health Related. Issues in Canada. 2013.
    1. Health Council of Canada. Population Patterns of Chronic Health Conditions in Canada: A Data Supplement to Why Health Care Renewal Matters: Learning From Canadians with Chronic Health Conditions. Toronto: Health Council; 2007.
    1. Statistics Canada. 2014. Health Trends. Statistics Canada Catalogue No. 82-213-XWE. Ottawa. 2014. Available at: http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/health-sante/82-213/index.cfm?Lang=ENG. Accessed July 18, 2018.
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada. How healthy are Canadians? A trend analysis of the health of Canadians from a healthy living and chronic disease perspective. 2016. Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/healthy-liv.... Accessed December 2, 2019.
    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Health Indicators 2008. Ottawa: CIHI; 2008.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources