Subglottic secretion drainage for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: an overview of systematic reviews and an updated meta-analysis
- PMID: 32051169
- PMCID: PMC9488747
- DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0107-2019
Subglottic secretion drainage for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: an overview of systematic reviews and an updated meta-analysis
Erratum in
-
Correction to subglottic secretion drainage for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: an overview of systematic reviews and an updated meta-analysis.Eur Respir Rev. 2022 Mar 23;31(163):220013. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0013-2022. Print 2022 Mar 31. Eur Respir Rev. 2022. PMID: 35321932 Free PMC article.
-
"Subglottic secretion drainage for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: an overview of systematic reviews and an updated meta-analysis". Diana P. Pozuelo-Carrascosa, Ángel Herráiz-Adillo, Celia Alvarez-Bueno, Jose Manuel Añón, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno and Iván Cavero-Redondo. Eur Respir Rev 2020; 29: 190107.Eur Respir Rev. 2022 Mar 23;31(163):195107. doi: 10.1183/16000617.5107-2019. Print 2022 Mar 31. Eur Respir Rev. 2022. PMID: 35321934 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Although several guidelines recommend subglottic secretion drainage as a strategy for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), its use is not widespread. With the aim to assess the effectiveness of subglottic secretion drainage for preventing VAP and to improve other outcomes such as mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital, an electronic search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase was undertaken. Nine systematic reviews with meta-analysis (in the overview of reviews) and 20 randomised controlled trials (in the updated meta-analysis) were included.In the overview of reviews, all systematic reviews with meta-analysis included found a positive effect of subglottic secretion drainage in the reduction of incidence of VAP. In the updated meta-analysis, subglottic secretion drainage significantly reduced VAP incidence (risk ratio (RR) 0.56, 95% CI 0.48-0.63; I2=0%, p=0.841) and mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.97; I2=0%, p=0.888).This is the first study that has found a decrease of mortality associated with the use of subglottic secretion drainage. In addition, subglottic secretion drainage is an effective measure to reduce VAP incidence, despite not improving the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU and/or hospital length of stay.
Copyright ©ERS 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: D.P Pozuelo-Carracosa has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Herráiz-Adillo has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Alvarez-Bueno has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.M. Añón has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Martínez-Vizcaíno has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Cavero-Redondo has nothing to disclose.
Figures



References
-
- Augustyn B. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: risk factors and prevention. Crit Care Nurse 2007; 27: 32–36. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources