Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;28(4):1199-1208.
doi: 10.1111/hsc.12953. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

Complexity in partnerships: A qualitative examination of collaborative depression care in primary care clinics and community-based organisations in California, United States

Affiliations

Complexity in partnerships: A qualitative examination of collaborative depression care in primary care clinics and community-based organisations in California, United States

Stuart Henderson et al. Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Partnering across health clinics and community organisations, while worthwhile for improving health and well-being, is challenging and time consuming. Even partnerships that have essential elements for success in place face inevitable challenges. To better understand how cross-organisational partnerships work in practice, this paper examines collaborations between six primary care clinics and community-based organisations in the United States that were part of an initiative to address late-life depression using an enhanced collaborative care model (Archstone Foundation Care Partners Project). As part of an evaluation of the Care Partners Project, 54 key informant interviews and 10 focus groups were conducted from 2015 to 2017. Additionally, more than 80 project-related documents were reviewed. Qualitative thematic analysis was used to code the transcripts and identify prominent themes in the data. Examining clinic and community organisation partnerships in practice highlighted their inherent complexity. The partnerships were fluid and constantly evolving, shaped by a multiplicity of perspectives and values, and vulnerable to unpredictability. Care Partners sites negotiated the complexity of their partnerships drawing upon three main strategies: adaptation (allowing for flexibility and rapid change); integration (providing opportunities for multi-level partnerships within and across organisations) and cultivation (fostering a commitment to the partnership and its value). These strategies provided opportunities for Care Partners collaborators to work with the inherent complexity of partnering. Intentionally acknowledging and embracing such complexity rather than trying to reduce or avoid it, may allow clinic and community collaborators to strengthen and sustain their partnerships.

Keywords: collaborative care; depression; evaluating complex interventions; multi-sector collaborations; older adults; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Model of enhanced collaborative care with the addition of the community‐based organisation (CBO). Clinic Care Manager: Provides evidenced‐based depression treatment to patients such as behavioral activation. CBO Care Manager: Offers support services to the patient, which may include housing and social service support. Also, may provide depression treatment to patients. Primary Care Provider (PCP): Works with clinic care manager to assess, monitor, and treat patient’s depression. Treatment may include medication management. Psychiatric Consultant: Communicates with the clinic and CBO care managers (through regular meetings) and PCP (often through the care manager or medical records) to provide diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations including medication management
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram of the relationship between cross‐organisational complexity and navigation strategies

References

    1. Aarons, G. A. , Fettes, D. , Hurlburt, M. , Palinkas, L. , Gunderson, L. , Willging, C. , & Chaffin, M. (2014). Collaboration, negotiation, and coalescence for interagency‐collaborative teams to scale‐up evidence‐based practice. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 43, 915–928. 10.1080/15374416.2013.876642 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bailit, M. , Tobey, R. , Maxwell, J. , & Bateman, C. (2015). The ACO conundrum: Safety‐net hospitals in the era of accountable care. Boston, MA: JSI Research & Training Institute; Retrieved from http://www.bailit-health.com/articles/2015-0504-bhp-jsi-rwjf-aco-conundr....
    1. Bernard, H. R. , & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    1. Bradley, E. H. , Curry, L. A. , & Devers, K. J. (2007). Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research, 42, 1758–1772. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braithwaite, J. , Churruca, K. , Long, J. C. , Ellis, L. A. , & Herkes, J. (2018). When complexity science meets implementation science: A theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change. BMC Medicine, 16, 63 10.1186/s12916-018-1057-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types