Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;26(2):151-161.
doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2020.1725700. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

Socio-ecological Factors of Zoonotic Diseases Exposure in Colorado Dairy Workers

Affiliations

Socio-ecological Factors of Zoonotic Diseases Exposure in Colorado Dairy Workers

Jairo Enrique Palomares Velosa et al. J Agromedicine. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: Zoonotic pathogens on dairy farms are a known risk for people who work and live there. Exposure and/or transmission of Salmonella serovars, E. coli (O157; H7), Campylobacter jejuni, and Cryptosporidium parvum have been documented to occur in the dairy farm environment. Social ecological factors have been identified as determinants of preventive behaviors of people at risk of infectious diseases.Methods: This study described the effect of socio-ecological factors on selected zoonotic bacterial and protozoal diseases in 42 workers of two dairy farms.Results: Occupational exposure to Salmonella ser. Dublin, E. coli, and Campylobacter spp. was confirmed. Self-efficacy and negative workplace perceptions were risk factors for Salmonella Dublin exposure (OR = 1.43[95% CI 1.11-2.22] & 1.22 [95% CI 1.02-1.53] respectively,). Additionally, safety knowledge and risk perceptions were protective factors of exposure (OR = 0.90 [95% CI 0.79-1.00]). Positive perceptions of supervisors and coworkers was a protective factor of Campylobacter exposure (OR = 0.89 [95% CI 0.79-0.98]).Conclusion: Results indicated that the presence of a supporting organizational environment, good communication with supervisors and coworkers, and training on prevention of zoonotic diseases would potentially reduce occupational exposures to zoonotic diseases on these farms.

Keywords: Socio-ecological factors; dairy; principal component analysis; risk; workers; zoonoses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Basic SEM model. Adapted from McLeroy et al..
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percentages distribution of the intentions of reporting to supervisor in case of a health event (n = 42).

References

    1. Salman M, Steneroden K. Important public health zoonoses through cattle. In: Sing A, ed. Zoonoses - Infections Affecting Humans and Animals. 1st ed. Springer, Dordrecht. 2014. p. 3–22.
    1. Van Kessel JS, Santin-Duran M, Karns JS, Schukken Y. 21 - Tracing zoonotic pathogens in dairy production. In: Brul S, Fratamico PM, McMeekin TA, eds. Tracing Pathogens in the Food Chain. Cambridge (UK): Woodhead Publishing; 2011:503–526.
    1. Feltus DC, Giddings CW, Schneck BL, Monson T, Warshauer D, McEvoy JM. Evidence supporting zoonotic transmission of cryptosporidium spp. in wisconsin. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(12):4303–4308. doi:10.1128/JCM.01067-06. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stenkamp-Strahm C, McConnel C, Hyatt DR, Magnuson R, Tenneson P, Linke L. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157 shedding in preweaned calves on Colorado dairies. J Food Prot. 2017;80(6):990–993. doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-531. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huston CL, Wittum TE, Love BC, Keen JE. Prevalence of fecal shedding of Salmonella spp in dairy herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;220(5):645–649. doi:10.2460/javma.2002.220.issue-5. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types