Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Feb 13;20(1):18.
doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-0292-7.

"I was seen by a radiologist, but unfortunately I can't remember the name and I still have questions. What should I do?" Radiologists should give thoughts to improve service professionalism and patient esteem

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

"I was seen by a radiologist, but unfortunately I can't remember the name and I still have questions. What should I do?" Radiologists should give thoughts to improve service professionalism and patient esteem

Andreas Gutzeit et al. Cancer Imaging. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study is to investigate how well patients remember the radiologist's name after a radiological examination, and whether giving the patient a business card improves the patient's perception of the radiologist's professionalism and esteem.

Methods: In this prospective and randomized two-centre study, a total of 141 patients with BI-RADS 1 and 2 scores were included. After screening examination comprising mammography and ultrasound by a radiologist, 71 patients received a business card (group 1), while 70 received no business card (group 2). Following the examination, patients were questioned about their experiences.

Results: The patients in group 1 could remember the name of the radiologist in 85% of cases. The patients in group 2, in contrast, could only remember the name in 7% of cases (p < 0.001). 90% of the patients in group 1 believed it was very important that they are able to contact the radiologist at a later time, whereas only 76% of patients in group 2 felt that this was a very important service (p < 0.025). A total of 87% of the patients in group 1 indicated that they would contact the radiologist if they had any questions whereas 73% of the patients in group 2 would like to contact the radiologist but were not able to do so, because they could not remember the name (p < 0.001). All questions were analysed with a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test that took study centre as stratification into account. In some cases, two categories were collapsed to avoid zero cell counts.

Conclusions: Using business cards significantly increased the recall of the radiologist's name and could be an important tool in improving the relationships between patients and radiologists and enhancing service professionalism.

Trial registration: We have a general approval from our ethics committee. The patients have given their consent to this study.

Keywords: Anxiety; Communication; Psychology, mammography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The radiologists from two breast imaging centers at the University Hospital Salzburg (Austria) and St. Anna Hospital in Lucerne (Switzerland) participated in this study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Following the mammography and ultrasound examinations, patients were given the radiologist’s business card (group 1)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
After completing the mammography and ultrasound examinations, the patient departs without receiving a business card from the radiologist (group 2)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lo Re G, De Luca R, Muscarneri F, et al. Relationship between anxiety level and radiological investigation. Comparison among different diagnostic imaging exams in a prospective single-center study. Radiol Med. 2016;121:763–768. doi: 10.1007/s11547-016-0664-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mettler FA, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency,radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950–2007. Radiology. 2009;253:520–531. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532082010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dendl LM, Teufel A, Schleder S, et al. Analysis of radiological case presentations and their impact on therapy and treatment concepts in internal medicine. Rofo. 2017;189:239–246. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-118884. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller LS, Shelby RA, Balmadrid MH. Patient anxiety before and immediately after imaging-guided breast biopsy procedures: impact of radiologist-patient communication. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:e62–e71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O'Mahony N, McCarthy E, McDermott R, O'Keeffe S. Who's the doctor? Patients' perceptions of the role of the breast radiologist: a lesson for all radiologists. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:e1184–e1189. doi: 10.1259/bjr/74006772. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types