Age change, official age and fairness in health
- PMID: 32054777
- DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106078
Age change, official age and fairness in health
Abstract
In a recent JME article, Joona Räsänen makes the case for allowing legal age change. We identify three problems with his argument and, on that basis, propose an improved version thereof. Unfortunately, even the improved argument is vulnerable to the objection that chronological age is a better proxy for justice in health than both legal and what we shall call official age.
Keywords: aged; distributive justice; ethics; political philosophy; public policy.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment in
-
Age change in healthcare settings: a reply to Lippert-Rasmussen and Petersen.J Med Ethics. 2020 Sep;46(9):636-637. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106144. Epub 2020 Mar 10. J Med Ethics. 2020. PMID: 32156784
Comment on
-
Moral case for legal age change.J Med Ethics. 2019 Jul;45(7):461-464. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105294. Epub 2019 Mar 14. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 30872325
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous