Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 27;10(45):10531-10536.
doi: 10.1039/c9sc03119g. eCollection 2019 Dec 7.

Modulating the surface defects of titanium oxides and consequent reactivity of Pt catalysts

Affiliations

Modulating the surface defects of titanium oxides and consequent reactivity of Pt catalysts

Yanan Wang et al. Chem Sci. .

Abstract

In heterogeneous catalysis, it is widely believed that the surface states of catalyst supports can strongly influence the catalytic performance, because active components are generally anchored on supports. This paper describes a detailed understanding of the influence of surface defects of TiO2 supports on the catalytic properties of Pt catalysts. Pt was deposited on reduced (r-), hydroxylated (h-), and oxidized (o-) TiO2 surfaces, respectively, and the different surface states of TiO2 not only lead to differences in metal dispersion, but also distinct electronic interactions between the metal and the support. The highest reactivity for catalytic CO oxidation can be achieved over the Pt catalyst supported on reduced TiO2 with surface oxygen vacancies. The turnover frequency (TOF) of this catalyst is determined to be ∼11 times higher than that of Pt supported on oxidized TiO2. More importantly, the reactivity is seen to increase in the sequence of Pt/o-TiO2 < Pt/h-TiO2 < Pt/r-TiO2, which is well consistent with the trend of the calculated Bader charge of Pt.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Bulk and surface properties of TiO2 supports. (A) XRD patterns of different TiO2 supports; (B) Raman spectra of different TiO2 supports; (C) XPS Ti 2p peaks of different TiO2 supports. The inset in (C) shows the Ti3+ species on reduced TiO2.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. HAADF-STEM and size distribution of Pt/TiO2 catalysts. (A–C) and (D–F) are HADDF-STEM and size distribution of Pt/r-TiO2, Pt/h-TiO2 and Pt/o-TiO2 before and after reaction, respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Reactivity, kinetic properties and DRIFTS of CO adsorption on Pt/TiO2 catalysts. (A) Light-off curves of CO conversion on different catalysts. The CO oxidation was conducted with a gas composition of 1% CO, 20% O2 and He balanced, keeping GHSV at 18 000 ml gcat.–1 h–1. Each point is tested at a fixed temperature three times and then ramped to higher temperature. (B) Arrhenius plot of CO oxidation on different catalysts. (C) DRIFTS in CO oxidation (1% CO, 20% O2 and He balanced) at 80 °C. The spectra were acquired after 5 minutes of reaction. (D) Plot of CO adsorption amount as a function of temperature in an Ar atmosphere. CO was pre-adsorbed at room temperature.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Calculated CO oxidation over Pt/TiO2 catalysts. (A) Free energy barriers for CO oxidation. (B–D) Models from left to right represent the initial state (IS), transition state (TS), final state (FS) and CO2 desorption of CO oxidation on Pt/r-TiO2, Pt/h-TiO2 and Pt/o-TiO2, respectively.

References

    1. Ahmadi M., Mistry H., Roldan Cuenya B. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016;7:3519–3533. - PubMed
    1. Shi F., Baker L. R., Hervier A., Somorjai G. A., Komvopoulos K. Nano Lett. 2013;13:4469–4474. - PubMed
    1. Divins N. J., Angurell I., Escudero C., Pérez-Dieste V., Llorca J. Science. 2014;346:620–623. - PubMed
    1. Wang Y., Widmann D., Behm R. J. ACS Catal. 2017;7:2339–2345.
    1. Wang Y., Widmann D., Heenemann M., Diemant T., Biskupek J., Schlögl R., Behm R. J. J. Catal. 2017;354:46–60.