Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 14;4(1):40-49.
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.09.002. eCollection 2020 Feb.

Best Definitions of Multimorbidity to Identify Patients With High Health Care Resource Utilization

Affiliations

Best Definitions of Multimorbidity to Identify Patients With High Health Care Resource Utilization

Carole E Aubert et al. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare different definitions of multimorbidity to identify patients with higher health care resource utilization.

Patients and methods: We used a multinational retrospective cohort including 147,806 medical inpatients discharged from 11 hospitals in 3 countries (United States, Switzerland, and Israel) between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011. We compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 8 definitions of multimorbidity, based on International Classification of Diseases codes defining health conditions, the Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index, the Elixhauser-van Walraven Comorbidity Index, body systems, or Clinical Classification Software categories to predict 30-day hospital readmission and/or prolonged length of stay (longer than or equal to the country-specific upper quartile). We used a lower (yielding sensitivity ≥90%) and an upper (yielding specificity ≥60%) cutoff to create risk categories.

Results: Definitions had poor to fair discriminatory power in the derivation (AUC, 0.61-0.65) and validation cohorts (AUC, 0.64-0.71). The definitions with the highest AUC were number of (1) health conditions with involvement of 2 or more body systems, (2) body systems, (3) Clinical Classification Software categories, and (4) health conditions. At the upper cutoff, sensitivity and specificity were 65% to 79% and 50% to 53%, respectively, in the validation cohort; of the 147,806 patients, 5% to 12% (7474 to 18,008) were classified at low risk, 38% to 55% (54,484 to 81,540) at intermediate risk, and 32% to 50% (47,331 to 72,435) at high risk.

Conclusion: Of the 8 definitions of multimorbidity, 4 had comparable discriminatory power to identify patients with higher health care resource utilization. Of these 4, the number of health conditions may represent the easiest definition to apply in clinical routine. The cutoff chosen, favoring sensitivity or specificity, should be determined depending on the aim of the definition.

Keywords: AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CCI, Chronic Condition Indicator; CCS, Clinical Classification Software; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; IQR, interquartile range; LOS, length of stay; NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; WHO, World Health Organization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Area area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the different definitions of multimorbidity to predict any 30-day hospital readmission and/or a prolonged length of stay (defined as a stay longer than or equal to the country-specific upper quartile [75%]) in the derivation cohort. A, Two or more distinct body system categories and number of health conditions. B, Two or more distinct body system categories and number of chronic health conditions. C, Number of distinct body system categories. D, Number of Clinical Classification Software categories. E, Number of health conditions. F, Number of chronic health conditions. G, Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index. H, Elixhauser-van-Walraven Comorbidity Index.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clerencia-Sierra M., Calderón-Larrañaga A., Martínez-Velilla N., et al. Multimorbidity patterns in hospitalized older patients: associations among chronic diseases and geriatric syndromes. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132909. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong A., Boshuizen H.C., Schellevis F.G., Kommer G.J., Polder J.J. Longitudinal administrative data can be used to examine multimorbidity, provided false discoveries are controlled for. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(10):1109–1117. - PubMed
    1. Friedman B., Jiang H.J., Elixhauser A., Segal A. Hospital inpatient costs for adults with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63(3):327–346. - PubMed
    1. Schneider F., Kaplan V., Rodak R., Battegay E., Holzer B. Prevalence of multimorbidity in medical inpatients. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012;142:w13533. - PubMed
    1. Fortin M., Stewart M., Poitras M.E., Almirall J., Maddocks H. A systematic review of prevalence studies on multimorbidity: toward a more uniform methodology. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(2):142–151. - PMC - PubMed