Looking at faces: first-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance
- PMID: 3205669
- DOI: 10.1068/p170043
Looking at faces: first-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance
Abstract
The encoding and relative importance of first-order (discrete) and second-order (configural) features in mental representations of unfamiliar faces have been investigated. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (KYST) was carried out on similarity judgments of forty-one photographs of faces (homogeneous with respect to sex, race, facial expression, and, to a lesser extent, age). A large set of ratings, measurements, and ratios of measurements of the faces was regressed against the three-dimensional KYST solution in order to determine the first-order and second-order features used to judge similarity. Parameters characterizing both first-order and second-order features emerged as important determinants of facial similarity. First-order feature parameters characterizing the appearance of the eyes, eyebrows, and mouth, and second-order feature parameters characterizing the position of the eyes, spatial relations between the internal features, and chin shape correlated with the dimensions of the KYST solution. There was little difference in the extent to which first-order and second-order features were encoded. Two higher-level parameters, age and weight, were also used to judge similarity. The implications of these results for mental representations of faces are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Looking at faces: first-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance.Perception. 2013;42(11):1179-99. doi: 10.1068/p170043n. Perception. 2013. PMID: 24601031
-
The effect of feature displacement on the perception of well-known faces.Perception. 1988;17(4):461-74. doi: 10.1068/p170461. Perception. 1988. PMID: 3244519
-
Attention to internal face features in unfamiliar face matching.Br J Psychol. 2008 Aug;99(Pt 3):379-94. doi: 10.1348/000712607X235872. Epub 2007 Aug 16. Br J Psychol. 2008. PMID: 17706001
-
Feature saliency in judging the sex and familiarity of faces.Perception. 1988;17(4):475-81. doi: 10.1068/p170475. Perception. 1988. PMID: 3244520
-
Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review.Memory. 2009 Jul;17(5):577-96. doi: 10.1080/09658210902976969. Memory. 2009. PMID: 19548173 Review.
Cited by
-
A Review and Clarification of the Terms "holistic," "configural," and "relational" in the Face Perception Literature.Front Psychol. 2012 Dec 17;3:559. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00559. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2012. PMID: 23413184 Free PMC article.
-
A multidimensional scaling approach to mental multiplication.Mem Cognit. 2002 Jan;30(1):97-106. doi: 10.3758/bf03195269. Mem Cognit. 2002. PMID: 11958359
-
Features and their configuration in face recognition.Mem Cognit. 1997 Sep;25(5):583-92. doi: 10.3758/bf03211301. Mem Cognit. 1997. PMID: 9337578
-
A computational shape-based model of anger and sadness justifies a configural representation of faces.Vision Res. 2010 Aug 6;50(17):1693-711. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.024. Epub 2010 May 25. Vision Res. 2010. PMID: 20510267 Free PMC article.
-
Face adaptation effects: reviewing the impact of adapting information, time, and transfer.Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 3;4:318. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00318. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23760550 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources