Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr:145:201-208.
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

Radiotherapy after primary CHEMotherapy (RAPCHEM): Practice variation in a Dutch registration study (BOOG 2010-03)

Affiliations

Radiotherapy after primary CHEMotherapy (RAPCHEM): Practice variation in a Dutch registration study (BOOG 2010-03)

Liesbeth J Boersma et al. Radiother Oncol. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Background: We conducted a prospective cohort study in the Netherlands (RAPCHEM: NCT01279304, BOOG 2010-03) in breast cancer (BC) patients treated with primary systemic therapy (PST), followed by surgery and post-operative radiation therapy (RT) according to a predefined consensus-based study-guideline (SG). The aim of the current analysis is to evaluate adherence to the SG.

Methods: From January 2011 to January 2015, patients with cT1-2N1 BC treated in 17 Dutch RT Centres were included. Patients with four or more suspicious nodes at imaging were excluded. SG recommended whole breast RT for patients treated with breast conserving therapy. SG on loco(-regional) RT were defined for three risk groups based on the ypN status: (1) ypN0 (low-risk): RT breast and no RT after mastectomy; (2) ypN1 (intermediate-risk): RT breast or chest wall; (3) ypN2 (high-risk): RT breast or chest wall, including regional lymph nodes.

Results: We included 848 patients: 292 in the low-risk group; 374 in the intermediate-risk group; 182 in the high-risk group. Overall, 64% of the patients was treated according to the SG; 11% received less RT than the predefined target volumes and 25% received more extensive RT than according to the SG. The largest variation was seen in the intermediate risk group, where only 54% was treated according to the SG.

Conclusion: Substantial deviation from the SG for post-operative RT was observed after PST, especially in patients with an intermediate-risk. Future analyses will evaluate outcome of these patients in relation to risk factors and the actual RT given.

Keywords: Guidelines; Lymph node treatment; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Practice variation; Primary systemic treatment; Radiation therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types