Associations between interrelated dimensions of socio-economic status, higher risk drinking and mental health in South East London: A cross-sectional study
- PMID: 32059050
- PMCID: PMC7021306
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229093
Associations between interrelated dimensions of socio-economic status, higher risk drinking and mental health in South East London: A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Aim: To examine patterns of hazardous, harmful and dependent drinking across different socio-economic groups, and how this relationship may be explained by common mental disorder.
Methods and findings: Between 2011-2013, 1,052 participants (age range 17-91, 53% female) were interviewed for Phase 2 of the South East London Community Health study. Latent class analysis was used to define six groups based on multiple indicators of socio-economic status in three domains. Alcohol use (low risk, hazardous, harmful/dependent) was measured using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and the presence of common mental disorder was measured using the revised Clinical Interview Schedule. Multinomial regression was used to explore associations with hazardous, harmful and dependent alcohol use, including after adjustment for common mental disorder. Harmful and dependent drinking was more common among people in Class 2 'economically inactive renters' (relative risk ratio (RRR) 3.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-8.71), Class 3 'economically inactive homeowners' (RRR 4.11, 95% CI 1.19-14.20) and Class 6 'professional renters' (RRR 3.51, 95% CI 1.14-10.78) than in Class 1 'professional homeowners'. Prevalent common mental disorder explained some of the increased risk of harmful or dependent drinking in Class 2, but not Class 3 or 6.
Conclusions: Across distinct socio-economic groups in a large inner-city sample, we found important differences in harmful and dependent drinking, only some of which were explained by common mental disorder. The increased risk of harmful or dependent drinking across classes which are very distinct from each other suggests differing underlying drivers of drinking across these groups. A nuanced understanding of alcohol use and problems is necessary to understand the inequalities in alcohol harms.
Conflict of interest statement
SB works at the Institute of Alcohol Studies which receives funding from the Alliance House Foundation. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organisation. Global status report on alcohol and health 2014. WHO. 2014 [cited 2017 Aug 15]. Available from: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/global_alcohol_report/en/
-
- GBD 2016 Alcohol Collaborators. Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 2018. August 23 [cited 2018 Aug 28];0(0). Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31310... - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kassebaum NJ, Arora M, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Brown J, Carter A, et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet. 2016. October 8;388(10053):1603–58. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Statistics on Alcohol, England, 2017—NHS Digital. [cited 2018 Mar 5]. Available from: http://digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB23940
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical