Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 14;20(1):142.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4854-x.

Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections

M Lafaurie  1   2 , E d'Anglejan  3 , J L Donay  4 , D Glotz  5 , E Sarfati  6 , M Mimoun  7 , M Legrand  8 , E Oksenhendler  9 , M Bagot  10 , S Valade  11 , B Bercot  4 , J M Molina  3
Affiliations

Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections

M Lafaurie et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Obligate anaerobes usually account for less than 10% of bacteria recovered from blood cultures (BC). The relevance of routine use of the anaerobic bottle is under debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI).

Methods: We conducted a 6-month, retrospective, monocentric study in a tertiary hospital. All positive BC were grouped into a single episode of bacteremia when drawn within 7 consecutive days. Bacteremia were classified into contaminants and BSI. Charts of patients with BSI due to obligate anaerobes were studied.

Results: A total of 19,739 blood cultures were collected, 2341 of which (11.9%) were positive. Anaerobic bottles were positive in 1528 (65.3%) of all positive BC but were positive alone (aerobic bottles negative) in 369 (15.8%). Overall 1081 episodes of bacteremia were identified, of which 209 (19.3%) had positive anaerobic bottles alone. The majority 126/209 (60.3%) were contaminants and 83 (39.7%) were BSI. BSI due to facultative anaerobes, obligate aerobes and obligate anaerobes were identified in 67 (80.7%), 3 (3.6%) and 13 (15.7%) of these 83 episodes, respectively. BSI due to obligate anaerobic bacteria were reported in 9 patients with gastro-intestinal disease, in 3 with febrile neutropenia and in 1 burned patient.

Conclusions: Anaerobic bottles contributed to the diagnosis of a significant number of episodes of bacteremia. Isolated bacteria were mostly contaminants and non-obligate anaerobic pathogens. Rare BSI due to obligate anaerobes were reported mainly in patients with gastro-intestinal disorders and during febrile neutropenia.

Keywords: Anaerobic; Bacteremia; Blood culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Results of blood cultures during the 6 month-study period, according to aerobic/anaerobic bottles
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kirn TJ, Weinstein MP. Update on blood cultures: how to obtain, process, report, and interpret. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2013;19:513–520. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12180. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartlett JG, Dick J. The controversy regarding routine anaerobic blood cultures. Am J Med. 2000;108:505–506. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00321-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lassmann B, Gustafson DR, Wood CM, et al. Reemergence of anaerobic bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:895–900. doi: 10.1086/512197. - DOI - PubMed
    1. James PA, Al-Shafi KM. Clinical value of anaerobic blood culture: a retrospective analysis of positive patient episodes. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:231–233. doi: 10.1136/jcp.53.3.231. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nguyen MH, Yu VL, Morris AJ, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and clinical outcome of Bacteroides bacteremia: findings of a multicenter prospective observational trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(6):870–876. doi: 10.1086/313805. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances