Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 20;180(4):605-632.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.025. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

Click Chemistry in Proteomic Investigations

Affiliations
Review

Click Chemistry in Proteomic Investigations

Christopher G Parker et al. Cell. .

Abstract

Despite advances in genetic and proteomic techniques, a complete portrait of the proteome and its complement of dynamic interactions and modifications remains a lofty, and as of yet, unrealized, objective. Specifically, traditional biological and analytical approaches have not been able to address key questions relating to the interactions of proteins with small molecules, including drugs, drug candidates, metabolites, or protein post-translational modifications (PTMs). Fortunately, chemists have bridged this experimental gap through the creation of bioorthogonal reactions. These reactions allow for the incorporation of chemical groups with highly selective reactivity into small molecules or protein modifications without perturbing their biological function, enabling the selective installation of an analysis tag for downstream investigations. The introduction of chemical strategies to parse and enrich subsets of the "functional" proteome has empowered mass spectrometry (MS)-based methods to delve more deeply and precisely into the biochemical state of cells and its perturbations by small molecules. In this Primer, we discuss how one of the most versatile bioorthogonal reactions, "click chemistry", has been exploited to overcome limitations of biological approaches to enable the selective marking and functional investigation of critical protein-small-molecule interactions and PTMs in native biological environments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Biological studies enabled by proteomics.
Highlighted in orange are applications that can be integrated with chemical methods to aide in proteomic investigations
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. General strategies to introduce bioorthogonal functionality to study proteins.
Step 1) Bioorthogonal reactive groups are first introduced onto protein targets through one of two general strategies, either i) direct chemical modification of endogenous proteins with chemical probes (top path), or ii) through a genetic tag, such as unnatural amino acid mutagenesis with functionalized amino acids and orthogonal tRNA/AARS pairs or enzymatic ligation of acceptor peptides with bioorthogonal motifs on engineered enzymes (bottom path). Step 2) Chemical tags possessing complementary bioorthogonal groups are selectively ligated to modified proteins. Step 3) Marked proteins are subsequently visualized, quantified and/or identified using a variety of techniques.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Common bioorthogonal chemical reactions. Red and blue circles correspond to the two “reactants” of a bioorthogonal reaction: 1) proteins labeled with a bioorthogonal reactive group and 2) complementary reactive tag for protein identification and/or visualization. Highlighted in yellow are the bioorthogonal reactive groups (left) and corresponding ligation product (right).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
General “bottom-up” proteomics experimental workflow.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Chemoproteomic methods to map features of proteins or to characterize molecular interactions of bioactive compounds using chemical probes. (A) General design of click probes used in protein-centric or chemical-centric proteomic investigations. (B) Schematic of proteomic workflows. (C) Various readouts of chemoproteomic investigations.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Examples of click probes chemical proteomic investigations
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
General classes of click-chemistry methods for the identification of post-translational modifications. a) The chemical reactivity of certain PTMs allows them to be reacted directly and selectively with bioorthogonal probes. b) The metabolism of living cells or animals can be exploited for the introduction of chemical probes with click-chemistry handles. c) Other PTMs can be modified enzymatically to install click-chemistry handles.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Chemical mechanisms responsible for the selective reaction of sulfenylated and sulfinylated cysteine residues with their respective probes.

References

    1. Abegg D, Frei R, Cerato L, Hari DP, Wang C, Waser J, and Adibekian A (2015). Proteome-wide profiling of targets of cysteine reactive small molecules by using ethynyl benziodoxolone reagents. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition 54, 10852–10857. - PubMed
    1. Abo M, Bak DW, and Weerapana E (2017). Optimization of caged electrophiles for improved monitoring of cysteine reactivity in living cells. ChemBioChem 18, 81–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abo M, and Weerapana E (2015). A caged electrophilic probe for global analysis of cysteine reactivity in living cells. J Am Chem Soc 137, 7087–7090. - PubMed
    1. Aebi M (2013). N-linked protein glycosylation in the er. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1833, 2430–2437. - PubMed
    1. Agard NJ, Prescher JA, and Bertozzi CR (2004). A strain-promoted [3 + 2] azide-alkyne cycloaddition for covalent modification of biomolecules in living systems. J Am Chem Soc 126, 15046–15047. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms