Clinicopathological significance of deficient DNA mismatch repair and MLH1 promoter methylation in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma
- PMID: 32060377
- DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0501-8
Clinicopathological significance of deficient DNA mismatch repair and MLH1 promoter methylation in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma
Abstract
The pathogenesis of DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient endometrial carcinoma (EC) is driven by inactivating methylation or less frequently mutation of an MMR gene (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, or MSH6). This study evaluated the prognostic and clinicopathologic differences between methylation-linked and nonmethylated MMR-deficient endometrioid ECs. We performed MMR immunohistochemistry and methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and classified 682 unselected endometrioid ECs as MMR proficient (MMRp, n = 438) and MMR deficient (MMRd, n = 244), with the latter subcategorized as methylated (MMRd Met) and nonmethylated tumors. Loss of MMR protein expression was detected in 35.8% of the tumors as follows: MLH1 + PMS2 in 29.8%, PMS2 in 0.9%, MSH2 + MSH6 in 1.3%, MSH6 in 2.8%, and multiple abnormalities in 0.9%. Of the 244 MMRd cases, 76% were methylation-linked. MMR deficiency was associated with older age, high grade of differentiation (G3), advanced stage (II-IV), larger tumor size, abundant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 positivity in immune cells and combined positive score, wild-type p53, negative L1CAM, ARID1A loss, and type of adjuvant therapy. MMRd-Met phenotype correlated with older age and larger tumor size, and predicted diminished disease-specific survival in the whole cohort. In the MMRd subgroup, univariate analysis demonstrated an association between disease-specific survival and disease stage II-IV, high grade (G3), deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular invasion, ER negativity, and L1CAM positivity. In conclusion, MMR methylation profile correlates with clinicopathologic characteristics of endometrioid EC, and MMRd-Met phenotype predicts lower disease-specific survival. MMR deficiency, but not MLH1 methylation status, correlates with T-cell inflammation and PD-L1 expression.
Similar articles
-
[Expression and clinical significance of MMR protein and MLH1 promoter methylation testing in endometrial cancer].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 25;53(12):823-830. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2018.12.005. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 30585020 Chinese.
-
PD-L1 Expression in Mismatch Repair-deficient Endometrial Carcinoma and Tumor-associated Immune Cells: Differences Between MLH1 Methylated and Nonmethylated Subgroups.Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2021 Nov 1;40(6):575-586. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000750. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2021. PMID: 33332859
-
Are all mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancers created equal? A large, retrospective, tertiary center experience.Eur J Cancer. 2025 May 2;220:115344. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115344. Epub 2025 Mar 5. Eur J Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40058269
-
Universal endometrial cancer tumor typing: How much has immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability, and MLH1 methylation improved the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome across the population?Cancer. 2019 Sep 15;125(18):3172-3183. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32203. Epub 2019 May 31. Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31150123 Review.
-
Colombian consensus for the molecular diagnosis of endometrial cancer.Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2024 Jun 17;75(1):4060. doi: 10.18597/rcog.4060. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2024. PMID: 39013200 Free PMC article. English, Spanish.
Cited by
-
ARID1 proteins: from transcriptional and post-translational regulation to carcinogenesis and potential therapeutics.Epigenomics. 2021 May;13(10):809-823. doi: 10.2217/epi-2020-0414. Epub 2021 Apr 23. Epigenomics. 2021. PMID: 33890484 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Identification and clinical validation of NUSAP1 as a novel prognostic biomarker in ovarian cancer.BMC Cancer. 2022 Jun 23;22(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09753-4. BMC Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35739489 Free PMC article.
-
PMS2 Expression With Combination of PD-L1 and TILs for Predicting Survival of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 5;12:897527. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.897527. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35865481 Free PMC article.
-
Unveiling DNA methylation: early diagnosis, risk assessment, and therapy for endometrial cancer.Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 20;14:1455255. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1455255. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39902129 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers for Endometrial Cancer in Clinical Practice: Recommendations/Proposal from the Italian Study Group.Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 8;12:805613. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.805613. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35463299 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD, Akbani R, Liu Y, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013;497:67–73. - DOI
-
- MacDonald ND, Salvesen HB, Ryan A, Iversen OE, Akslen LA, Jacobs IJ. Frequency and prognostic impact of microsatellite instability in a large population-based study of endometrial carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2000;60:1750–2. - PubMed
-
- Whitcomb BP, Mutch DG, Herzog TJ, Rader JS, Gibb RK, Goodfellow PJ. Frequent HOXA11 and THBS2 promoter methylation, and a methylator phenotype in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:2277–87. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous