Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;49(10):1658-1675.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01315-6. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

Tacit working models of human behavioural change II: Farmers' folk theories of conservation programme design

Affiliations

Tacit working models of human behavioural change II: Farmers' folk theories of conservation programme design

M Root-Bernstein et al. Ambio. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Community involvement may be essential for conservation programme success. We focus on farmers, asking how and why they believe conservation interventions will work, or not. Here we test models of folk theories of the human motivational factors required for behaviour change, in 3 rural central Chilean communities. We hypothesize that different models will be supported by farmers with different experiences with conservation programmes, and that socioeconomic and production system variation will explain further variation in who supports each working model. We use a multiple methods approach, combining a questionnaire with participant-observation. We find support for three of the working models of human behavioural change, among different socio-economic profiles of farmers. We believe that the schema of working models provides a boundary object to facilitate communication between conservationists and stakeholders, and can help improve conservation project design and implementation.

Keywords: Behavioural change; Conservation; Farmers; Motivation; Values.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The gradient space formed by the four working models
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The three study sites in the area known as the Cordillera de Cantillana, showing the landcover context within the concerned municipal boundaries
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Indices data. For explanations of the indices see Table 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The cards depicting the statements representing the working models. The most frequent response for all statements was “Very Important”. On the left, the statements most often categorized as “Not Important”. Images drawn by AB

References

    1. Agnoletti M, Rotherham ID. Landscape and biocultural diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2015;24:3155–3165.
    1. Alfonso A, Zorondo-Rodríguez F, Simonetti JA. Perceived changes in environmental degradation and loss of ecosystem services, and their implications in human well-being. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 2017;24:561–574.
    1. Armesto JJ, Manuschevich D, Mora A, Smith-Ramirez C, Rozzi R, Abarzúa AM, Marquet PA. From the Holocene to the Anthropocene: A historical framework for land cover change in southwestern South America in the past 15,000 years. Land Use Policy. 2010;27:148–160.
    1. Barreiro-Hurlé J, Espinosa-Goded M, Dupraz P. Does intensity of change matter? Factors affecting adoption of agri-environmental schemes in Spain. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2010;53:891–905.
    1. Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD. Farmland biodiversity: Is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2003;18:182–188.

LinkOut - more resources