Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;178(9):1891-1906.
doi: 10.1111/bph.15024. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

Overview of treatment approaches to osteoporosis

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Overview of treatment approaches to osteoporosis

Bente L Langdahl. Br J Pharmacol. 2021 May.
Free article

Abstract

Efficient therapies are available for the treatment of osteoporosis. Anti-resorptive therapies, including bisphosphonates and denosumab, increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the risk of fractures by 20-70%. Bone-forming or dual-action treatments stimulate bone formation and increase BMD more than the anti-resorptive therapies. Two studies have demonstrated that these treatments are superior to anti-resorptives in preventing fractures in patients with severe osteoporosis. Bone-forming or dual-action treatments should be followed by anti-resorptive treatment to maintain the fracture risk reduction. The BMD gains seen with bone-forming and dual-action treatments are greater in treatment-naïve patients compared to patients pretreated with anti-resorptive treatments. However, the antifracture efficacy seems to be preserved. Treatment failure will often lead to switch of treatment from orally to parentally administrated anti-resorptives treatment or from anti-resorptive to bone-forming or dual-action treatment. Osteoporosis is a chronic condition and therefore needs a long-term management plan with a personalized approach to treatment. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on The molecular pharmacology of bone and cancer-related bone diseases. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v178.9/issuetoc.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abrahamsen, B., Eiken, P., Prieto-Alhambra, D., & Eastell, R. (2016). Risk of hip, subtrochanteric, and femoral shaft fractures among mid and long term users of alendronate: Nationwide cohort and nested case-control study. BMJ, 353, i3365. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3365
    1. Adachi, J. D., Saag, K. G., Delmas, P. D., Liberman, U. A., Emkey, R. D., Seeman, E., … Daifotis, A. (2001). Two-year effects of alendronate on bone mineral density and vertebral fracture in patients receiving glucocorticoids: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled extension trial. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 44(1), 202-211.
    1. Adams, A. L., Adams, J. L., Raebel, M. A., Tang, B. T., Kuntz, J. L., Vijayadeva, V., … Gozansky, W. S. (2018). Bisphosphonate drug holiday and fracture risk: A population-based cohort study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 33(7), 1252-1259. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3420
    1. Alexander, S. P. H., Christopoulos, A., Davenport, A. P., Kelly, E., Mathie, A., Peters, J. A., … Collaborators, C. (2019). The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology, 176(Suppl 1), S21-S141. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14748
    1. Alexander, S. P. H., Cidlowski, J. A., Kelly, E., Mathie, A., Peters, J. A., Veale, E. L., … Collaborators, C. (2019). The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: Nuclear hormone receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology, 176(Suppl 1), S229-S246. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14750

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources