Efficacy of alternative or additional methods to professional mechanical plaque removal during supportive periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 32060940
- DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13269
Efficacy of alternative or additional methods to professional mechanical plaque removal during supportive periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Aims: To systematically review the literature addressing the following focused questions: "What is the efficacy of either (#1) alternative or (#2) additional methods to professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) on progression of attachment loss during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) in periodontitis patients?".
Methods: A systematic search for randomized clinical trials was performed. Change in clinical attachment level (CAL) from baseline was the primary outcome.
Results: Routine PMPR performed with either a combination of ultrasonic/hand instruments or Er:Yag laser showed similarly effective in preventing CAL loss. Moreover, a routine SPT regimen based on PMPR led to stability of CAL irrespective of a daily sub-antimicrobial doxycycline dose (SDD). Finally, an adjunctive photodynamic therapy (PDT) did not enhance the magnitude of CAL gain when sites with probing depth ≥4 mm were repeatedly treated. After pooling all data, the results of the meta-analysis showed no statistical differences in CAL change from baseline: mean overall CAL change was -0.233 mm (95% confidence interval: -1.065, 0.598; p = .351).
Conclusions: Weak evidence indicate that in treated periodontitis patients enrolled in a 3-4 month SPT based on PMPR, Er:Yag laser (as alternative), SDD and PDT (as additional) do not produce a greater clinical effect on periodontal conditions compared to PMPR.
Keywords: disease progression; periodontal diseases; periodontitis; secondary prevention.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- American Academy of Periodontology (no authors listed). (2000). Parameter on periodontal maintenance. Journal of Periodontology, 71(Suppl 5), 849-850.
-
- Braun, A., Jepsen, S., Deimling, D., & Ratka-Krüger, P. (2010). Subjective intensity of pain during supportive periodontal treatment using a sonic scaler or an Er:YAG laser. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 37, 340-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01536.x
-
- Campos, G. N., Pimentel, S. P., Ribeiro, F. V., Casarin, R. C., Cirano, F. R., Saraceni, C. H., & Casati, M. Z. (2013). The adjunctive effect of photodynamic therapy for residual pockets in single-rooted teeth: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Lasers in Medical Science, 28, 317-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1159-3
-
- Carvalho, V. F., Andrade, P. V., Rodrigues, M. F., Hirata, M. H., Hirata, R. D., Pannuti, C. M., … Conde, M. C. (2015). Antimicrobial photodynamic effect to treat residual pockets in periodontal patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 42, 440-447. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12393
-
- Chambrone, L., Chambrone, D., Lima, L. A., & Chambrone, L. A. (2010). Predictors of tooth loss during long-term periodontal maintenance: A systematic review of observational studies. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 37, 675-684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01587.x
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
