Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 18;9(4):e014748.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014748. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

Sex-Specific Associations of Vascular Risk Factors With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Findings From 1.5 Million Women and 0.8 Million Men in the United States and United Kingdom

Affiliations

Sex-Specific Associations of Vascular Risk Factors With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Findings From 1.5 Million Women and 0.8 Million Men in the United States and United Kingdom

Jennifer L Carter et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background Large studies are required for reliable estimates of important risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This could guide targeted AAA screening programs, particularly in subgroups like women who are currently excluded from such programs. Method and Results In a cross-sectional study, 1.5 million women and 0.8 million men without known vascular disease attended commercial screening clinics in the United Kingdom or United States from 2008 to 2013. Measurements of vascular risk factors were related to AAA using logistic regression with correction for regression dilution bias. Screening detected 12 729 new AAA cases (0.6%). Compared with never smoking, current smoking was associated with 15 times the risk of AAA among women (risk ratio 15.0, 95% CI 13.2-17.0) and 7 times among men (7.3, 6.4-8.2). In women aged <75 years, the risk of AAA was nearly 30 times greater in current smokers (26.4, 20.3-34.2). In every age group, the prevalence of AAA in female smokers was greater than in male never-smokers. Positive log-linear associations with AAA for women and men were also observed for usual body mass index, usual systolic blood pressure, height, usual low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and usual triglycerides. Conclusions Log-linear increases in the risks of AAA with traditional vascular risk factors should be considered when evaluating populations that may be at-risk for the development of AAA, and when considering potential treatments. However, at any given age, female smokers are at higher risk of AAA than male never-smokers, and a policy of screening male never-smokers but not higher-risk female smokers is questionable.

Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm; risk factors; smoking; women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 2 331 943 asymptomatic screenees, by age, sex, and smoking (current vs never).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm with current smoking, by age and sex. Risk ratios are adjusted for body mass index and country, sex, and age where appropriate.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm with usual systolic blood pressure, BMI, and height in men and women. Risk ratios are adjusted for age, sex, and country, and are plotted against the means of the resurvey values. BMI is additionally adjusted for smoking. Usual SD: BMI=4.0 kg/m2; systolic blood pressure=12.9 mm Hg; height (men)=0.07 m; height (women)=0.07 m. AAA indicates abdominal aortic aneurysm; BMI, body mass index; RR, risk ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm with lipid fractions. Risk ratios are adjusted for age, sex, country, and other lipid fractions, and are plotted against the means of the resurvey values. Usual SD: Low density lipoprotein‐cholesterol=0.65 mmol/L; high density lipoprotein‐cholesterol=0.37 mmol/L; triglycerides=1.3‐fold higher. AAA indicates abdominal aortic aneurysm; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein; RR, risk ratio.

References

    1. Stather PW, Sidloff DA, Rhema IA, Choke E, Bown MJ, Sayers RD. A review of current reporting of abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality and prevalence in the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;47:240–242. - PubMed
    1. Reimerink JJ, van der Laan MJ, Koelemay MJ, Balm R, Legemate DA. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of population‐based mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1405–1413. - PubMed
    1. Guirguis‐Blake JM, Beil TL, Sun X, Senger CA, Whitlock EP. Primary care screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014 Jan. (Evidence Syntheses, No. 109.) 4, Discussion. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK184795/. Accessed March 4, 2019. - PubMed
    1. Cosford PA, Leng GC, Thomas J. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2 10.1002/14651858.CD002945.pub2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. LeFevre ML. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:281–290. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources