Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;10(1):110-119.

Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence by Sexual Orientation, United States

Jieru Chen  1 , Mikel L Walters  2 , Leah K Gilbert  1 , Nimesh Patel  1
Affiliations

Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence by Sexual Orientation, United States

Jieru Chen et al. Psychol Violence. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence (IPV) across sexual orientation groups among U.S. adults.

Method: From 2010 to 2012, national probability samples (n = 41,174) of English- or Spanish-speaking noninstitutionalized U.S. adults were interviewed to assess the prevalence of violence and injury as part of the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey. National estimates across sexual orientation groups were compared.

Results: Compared with heterosexual women, both bisexual women and lesbians experienced more contact sexual violence (CSV) and noncontact unwanted sexual violence by any perpetrator. In addition, bisexual women experienced more stalking by any perpetrator, IPV, and IPV-related impact than did heterosexual women. Compared with lesbians, bisexual women reported more CSV and stalking by any perpetrator, IPV, and IPV-related impact. Compared with heterosexual men, both bisexual and gay men experienced more CSV and noncontact unwanted sexual violence, and gay men experienced more stalking. Although there were no detected statistically significant differences in the prevalence of IPV overall, gay men did report more IPV-related impacts compared with heterosexual men.

Conclusion: Results reveal a significantly elevated burden of violence experienced by certain sexual minorities.

Keywords: NISVS; intimate partner violence; sexual orientation; sexual violence; stalking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Armstrong GS, Branch KA, Cwick JM, Dretch E, Jones TR, Khan S, … Spraitz J (2018). Contemporary issues in victimology: Identifying patterns and trends. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
    1. Basile KC, DeGue S, Jones K, Freire K, Dills J, Smith SG, & Raiford JL (2016). STOP SV: A technical package to prevent sexual violence. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    1. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, Smith SG, Walters ML, Merrick MT, … Stevens MR (2011). National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) summary report 2010. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    1. Blosnich JR, & Bossarte RM (2009). Comparisons of intimate partner violence among partners in same-sex and opposite-sex relationships in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 2182–2184. 10.2105/AJPH.2008.139535 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bornstein DR, Fawcett J, Sullivan M, Senturia KD, & Shiu-Thornton S (2006). Understanding the experiences of lesbian, bisexual and trans survivors of domestic violence: A qualitative study. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 159–181. 10.1300/J082v51n01_08 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources