Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Apr;107(5):484-488.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11558. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

Efficacy of Sphinkeeper™ implant in treating faecal incontinence

Affiliations
Observational Study

Efficacy of Sphinkeeper™ implant in treating faecal incontinence

F Litta et al. Br J Surg. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

The primary aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of Sphinkeeper™ (SK) implantation in patients with faecal incontinence. Forty-two patients with faecal incontinence (14 with sphincter defects) underwent SK implantation and were followed up for a mean(s.d.) of 15·9(8·6) months. SK implantation was a safe and effective method that improved patients' quality of life. Implants and incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Device for Sphinkeeper™ implantation The device includes both the delivery system and dispensers in which a single prosthesis is placed; the prostheses are made of polyacrylonitrile (Hyexpan™; THD SpA, Correggio, Italy). When in a dehydrated state, they are thin and solid cylinders; 48 h after contact with body fluids, they change size, becoming shorter.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Target area for prosthesis placement The target area is at the level of the upper and middle thirds of the anal canal. a Adequate and b inadequate implantation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Frequency of postdefaecation episodes of soiling at baseline and during follow‐up *Data collected at last follow‐up session. Frequency: never – none; rarely – less than once per month; sometimes – less than once per week to once or more per month; often – less than once per day to at least once per week; always – at least once per day. †P < 0·001 versus baseline (marginal homogeneity test).

References

    1. Sharma A, Yuan L, Marshall RJ, Merrie AE, Bissett IP. Systematic review of the prevalence of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2016; 103: 1589–1597. - PubMed
    1. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK, Yeh CH, Murray‐Green C. Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 5: 494–502. - PubMed
    1. Glasgow SC, Lowry AC. Long‐term outcomes of anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 482–490. - PubMed
    1. Bielefeldt K. Adverse events of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence reported to the federal drug administration. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2016; 7: 294–305. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ratto C, Parello A, Donisi L, Litta F, De Simone V, Spazzafumo L et al Novel bulking agent for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1644–1652. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types