Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;24(6):3739-3744.
doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15014. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

A critical role of the KCa 3.1 channel in mechanical stretch-induced proliferation of rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells

Affiliations

A critical role of the KCa 3.1 channel in mechanical stretch-induced proliferation of rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells

Xiaoling Jia et al. J Cell Mol Med. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Mechanical stimulation is an important factor regulating mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) functions such as proliferation. The Ca2+ -activated K+ channel, KCa 3.1, is critically engaged in MSC proliferation but its role in mechanical regulation of MSC proliferation remains unknown. Here, we examined the KCa 3.1 channel expression and its role in rat bone marrow-derived MSC (BMSC) proliferation in response to mechanical stretch. Application of mechanical stretch stimulated BMSC proliferation via promoting cell cycle progression. Such mechanical stimulation up-regulated the KCa 3.1 channel expression and pharmacological or genetic inhibition of the KCa 3.1 channel strongly suppressed stretch-induced increase in cell proliferation and cell cycle progression. These results support that the KCa 3.1 channel plays an important role in transducing mechanical forces to MSC proliferation. Our finding provides new mechanistic insights into how mechanical stimuli regulate MSC proliferation and also a viable bioengineering approach to improve MSC proliferation.

Keywords: KCa3.1 channel; bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells; cell proliferation; mechanical stretch.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of mechanical stretch on BMSC proliferation. A, summary of the effects of exposing BMSC to 2.5%‐15% mechanical stretch for 6, 12 and 24 h on cell proliferation relative to static control (SC). The mean data are from five independent experiments. *P < .05 and **P < .01 compared to SC using one‐way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher's test. B‐C, representative analysis of cell cycle distribution in cells under indicated conditions (B), and summary of the mean data from 4 independent experiments (C). Cells were fixed with 70% ethanol overnight, incubated in PBS staining solution (20 μg/mL propidium iodide, 100 μg/mL RNase A, and 0.1% Triton X‐100) at 37°C for 30 min and analysed by FACS on FL‐2 channel. The data were analysed using ModFit software
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of mechanical stretch on KCa3.1 expression and activity and the role of KCa3.1 channel in mechanical stimulation of BMSC proliferation. A‐D, effects of exposing BMSC to 2.5%‐15% mechanical stretch for 24 h on the KCa3.1 expression levels. A and C, representative results showing the KCa3.1 mRNA expression using RT‐PCR and KCa3.1 cell surface protein expression using flow cytometry. B and D, summary of the mean data as shown in (A) and (C), respectively, from six independent experiments. *P < .05 and **P < .01, using one‐way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher's test. E, summary of the I‐V relationship curves of the mean TRAM‐34 sensitive K+ current densities recorded from seven cells for each condition. Control, isotonic solution; Stretch, hypotonic solution. *P < .05 and **P < .01. Student's t test was used to compare the current density between control and stretch at the same potential. F‐K, summary of BMSC proliferation and cell cycle under indicated conditions after treatment with 100 nmol/L TRAM34 (F, H, J) or siRNA‐mediated knockdown of the KCa3.1 expression (G, I, K), from four independent experiments. *P < .05 and **P < .01, using one‐way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher's test

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284:143‐147. - PubMed
    1. Caplan AI. Adult mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering versus regenerative medicine. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213:341‐347. - PubMed
    1. Banfi A, Muraglia A, Dozin B, Mastrogiacomo M, Cancedda R, Quarto R. Proliferation kinetics and differentiation potential of ex vivo expanded human bone marrow stromal cells: Implications for their use in cell therapy. Exp Hematol. 2000;28:707‐715. - PubMed
    1. Wagner W, Horn P, Castoldi M, et al. Replicative senescence of mesenchymal stem cells: a continuous and organized process. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2213. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park JS, Chu JS, Cheng C, Chen F, Chen D, Li S. Differential effects of equiaxial and uniaxial strain on mesenchymal stem cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004;88:359‐368. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances