Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 17;22(1):21.
doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01260-3.

Clinical applications of polygenic breast cancer risk: a critical review and perspectives of an emerging field

Affiliations
Review

Clinical applications of polygenic breast cancer risk: a critical review and perspectives of an emerging field

Tatiane Yanes et al. Breast Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Polygenic factors are estimated to account for an additional 18% of the familial relative risk of breast cancer, with those at the highest level of polygenic risk distribution having a least a twofold increased risk of the disease. Polygenic testing promises to revolutionize health services by providing personalized risk assessments to women at high-risk of breast cancer and within population breast screening programs. However, implementation of polygenic testing needs to be considered in light of its current limitations, such as limited risk prediction for women of non-European ancestry. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the evidence for polygenic breast cancer risk, including the discovery of variants associated with breast cancer at the genome-wide level of significance and the use of polygenic risk scores to estimate breast cancer risk. We also review the different applications of this technology including testing of women from high-risk breast cancer families with uninformative genetic testing results, as a moderator of monogenic risk, and for population screening programs. Finally, a potential framework for introducing testing for polygenic risk in familial cancer clinics and the potential challenges with implementing this technology in clinical practice are discussed.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Polygenic risk score; Risk prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors TY, MAY, and PJ declare that they have no competing interests. Author BM Meiser has a remunerated consultant role with the company Astrazeneca with respect to an unrelated project.

References

    1. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet. 2001;358(9291):1389–1399. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06524-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lichtenstein P, et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(2):78–85. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007133430201. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bahcall O. Common variation and heritability estimates for breast, ovarian and prostate cancers. Nat Genet. 2019. 10.1038/ngicogs.1.
    1. Michailidou K, et al. Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci. Nature. 2017;551(7678):92–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas DM, James PA, Ballinger ML. Clinical implications of genomics for cancer risk genetics. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e303–e308. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70026-4. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances