Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;29(4):816-822.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0873. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

Leveraging Digital Data to Inform and Improve Quality Cancer Care

Tina Hernandez-Boussard  1   2   3 , Douglas W Blayney  4   5 , James D Brooks  5   6
Affiliations

Leveraging Digital Data to Inform and Improve Quality Cancer Care

Tina Hernandez-Boussard et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Efficient capture of routine clinical care and patient outcomes is needed at a population-level, as is evidence on important treatment-related side effects and their effect on well-being and clinical outcomes. The increasing availability of electronic health records (EHR) offers new opportunities to generate population-level patient-centered evidence on oncologic care that can better guide treatment decisions and patient-valued care.

Methods: This study includes patients seeking care at an academic medical center, 2008 to 2018. Digital data sources are combined to address missingness, inaccuracy, and noise common to EHR data. Clinical concepts were identified and extracted from EHR unstructured data using natural language processing (NLP) and machine/deep learning techniques. All models are trained, tested, and validated on independent data samples using standard metrics.

Results: We provide use cases for using EHR data to assess guideline adherence and quality measurements among patients with cancer. Pretreatment assessment was evaluated by guideline adherence and quality metrics for cancer staging metrics. Our studies in perioperative quality focused on medications administered and guideline adherence. Patient outcomes included treatment-related side effects and patient-reported outcomes.

Conclusions: Advanced technologies applied to EHRs present opportunities to advance population-level quality assessment, to learn from routinely collected clinical data for personalized treatment guidelines, and to augment epidemiologic and population health studies. The effective use of digital data can inform patient-valued care, quality initiatives, and policy guidelines.

Impact: A comprehensive set of health data analyzed with advanced technologies results in a unique resource that facilitates wide-ranging, innovative, and impactful research on prostate cancer. This work demonstrates new ways to use the EHRs and technology to advance epidemiologic studies and benefit oncologic care.See all articles in this CEBP Focus section, "Modernizing Population Science."

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Our CAPTIVE infrastructure combines heterogeneous data sources and uses state of the art technology to transform data to knowledge for care improvement.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Guideline adherence based on data extracted from billing codes and radiology reports and the health care system (CPT + radiology) augmented by report of bone scan within providers’ unstructured text (NLP). Percentage of patients undergoing a bone scan stratified by risk group according to the NCCN and AUA guidelines.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Distribution of Discharge Drug Modality in two diverse healthcare settings, 2008–2015.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M. To err is human: building a safer health system. USA: Insitute of Medicine; 1999. - PubMed
    1. Simone JV, Hewitt M. Ensuring quality cancer care. National Academies Press; 1999. - PubMed
    1. Jacobson JO, Neuss MN, McNiff KK, et al. Improvement in oncology practice performance through voluntary participation in the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(11):1893–1898. - PubMed
    1. Neuss MN, Desch CE, McNiff KK, et al. A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(25):6233–6239. - PubMed
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Patient Safety Indicators, PSI. Version 4.1b ed. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality,; 2011.

Publication types

MeSH terms