Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):18.
doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-0285-6.

Identification of the true hyperdiploid multiple myeloma subset by combining conventional karyotyping and FISH analysis

Affiliations

Identification of the true hyperdiploid multiple myeloma subset by combining conventional karyotyping and FISH analysis

Gregorio Barilà et al. Blood Cancer J. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Kaplan–Meier curves showing overall survival of HRD MM patients according to cytogenetic and FISH features.
a According to the number of FISH alterations (≥2 or <2) (p = 0.0123). b Based on the presence or absence of IGH rearrangement (p = 0.0319). c According to the presence of 1q gain (p = 0.0929). d Depending on the transplant status (p = 0.0465). e According to the concomitant presence of 9/11/15 trisomies (p = 0.0218). f Based on T-HRD MM (≥5 trisomies) and N-HRD MM (<5 trisomies) classification (p = 0.0105). The comparisons between groups were made by log-rank test. HRD MM hyperdiploid multiple myeloma, FISH fluorescent in situ hybridization, IGH immunoglobulin heavy locus, ASCT autologous stem cell transplantation, N-HRD MM non-trisomic hyperdiploid multiple myeloma, T-HRD MM trisomic hyperdiploid multiple myeloma.

References

    1. Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;364:1046–1060. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1011442. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morgan GJ, Walker BA, Davies FE. The genetic architecture of multiple myeloma. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2012;12:335–348. doi: 10.1038/nrc3257. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV. The multiple myelomas—current concepts in cytogenetic classification and therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018;15:409–421. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0018-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manier S, et al. Genomic complexity of multiple myeloma and its clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017;14:100–113. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.122. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kumar S, et al. Trisomies in multiple myeloma: impact on survival in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Blood. 2012;119:2100–2105. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-390658. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances