Exosomal biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and patient monitoring
- PMID: 32067543
- PMCID: PMC7071954
- DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2020.1731308
Exosomal biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and patient monitoring
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, extensive research has been conducted on using exosomes as biomarkers for cancer detection. Exosomes are 40-150 nm-sized extracellular vesicles released by all cell types, including tumor cells. Exosomes are stable in body fluids due to their lipid bilayer member and often contain DNA, RNA, and proteins. These exosomes can be harvested from blood, plasma, serum, urine, or saliva and analyzed for tumor-relevant mutations. Thus, exosomes provide an alternative to current methods of tumor detection.Areas covered: This review discusses the use of exosomal diagnostics in various tumor types as well as their examination in various clinical trials. The authors also discuss the limitations of exosome-based diagnostics in the clinical setting and provide examples of several studies in which the development and usage of microfluidic chips and nano-sensing devices have been utilized to address these obstacles.Expert commentary: In recent years, exosomes and their contents have exhibited potential as novel tumor detection markers despite the labor involved in their harvest and isolation. Despite this, much work is being done to optimize exosome capture and analysis. Thus, their roles as biomarkers in the clinical setting appear promising.
Keywords: Biomarkers; cancer detection; diagnostics; exosomes; extracellular vesicles; microfluidic chips; nano-sensors; tumor detection.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interest
The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
Figures

References
-
- Egan TK. Monitoring Patients Undergoing Cancer Therapy. Lab. Med [Internet]. 2000. [cited 2018 Dec 1];31:666–671. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/labmed/article-lookup/doi/10.1309/R078-Y40Q-PAJ.... - DOI
-
- Graham LJ, Shupe MP, Schneble EJ, et al. Current approaches and challenges in monitoring treatment responses in breast cancer. J. Cancer [Internet]. 2014. [cited 2019 Aug 23];5:58–68. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24396498. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Neal RD, Tharmanathan P, France B, et al. Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review. Br. J. Cancer [Internet]. 2015. [cited 2019 Aug 2];112 Suppl:S92–107. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25734382. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Car LT, Papachristou N, Urch C, et al. Preventing delayed diagnosis of cancer: clinicians’ views on main problems and solutions. J. Glob. Health [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2019 Aug 2];6:020901 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28028437. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Cassim S, Chepulis L, Keenan R, et al. Patient and carer perceived barriers to early presentation and diagnosis of lung cancer: a systematic review. BMC Cancer [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2019 Aug 2];19:25 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30621616. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical