The selective pressure of quorum quenching on microbial communities in membrane bioreactors
- PMID: 32069724
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125953
The selective pressure of quorum quenching on microbial communities in membrane bioreactors
Abstract
In conventional membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment systems, Gram-negative bacterial population appears to be always outnumbered Gram-positive community. Thereby, acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs), major signaling molecules utilized by Gram-negative bacteria, have been targeted for biofouling control in quorum quenching (QQ) based studies. This study investigated the impact of AHL and autoinducer-2 (AI-2)-degrading QQ consortium on the selective accumulation of microbial communities in a QQ MBR (MBR-QQb). The results show that addition of the QQ consortium (in the form of beads) increased the filtration time of MBR-QQb by 3.5 times. The distribution of mixed liquor extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), especially the tightly bound (TB) proteinous EPS and the floc size were strongly affected by the QQ activity, and the endless 'battle' between QQ and quorum sensing (QS). More importantly, QQ induced the significant suppression of Gram-negative bacterial community. The average abundance of Gram-positive bacteria at the genus level in the biocake of MBR-QQb (51%) was significantly higher than that of the control MBR (11%) and the MBR with vacant beads (28%). These findings suggest that an unintended condition is created to favor the growth of Gram-positive bacteria in QQ MBRs, resulting in a distinct microbial social network in both bulk sludge and biocake.
Keywords: Biofouling control; Membrane bioreactor (MBR); Microbial composition; Quorum quenching.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Control of indigenous quorum quenching bacteria on membrane biofouling in a short-period MBR.Bioresour Technol. 2019 Jul;283:261-269. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.082. Epub 2019 Mar 19. Bioresour Technol. 2019. PMID: 30913434
-
Insights into quorum quenching mechanisms to control membrane biofouling under changing organic loading rates.Chemosphere. 2017 Sep;182:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.151. Epub 2017 May 3. Chemosphere. 2017. PMID: 28486154
-
Combining quorum quenching by Rhodococcus sp. BH4 and Acinetobacter sp. DKY-1 to control biofouling in membrane bioreactors.Bioresour Technol. 2025 Feb;418:131981. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131981. Epub 2024 Dec 15. Bioresour Technol. 2025. PMID: 39681273
-
Process-Oriented Review of Bacterial Quorum Quenching for Membrane Biofouling Mitigation in Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs).Membranes (Basel). 2016 Dec 13;6(4):52. doi: 10.3390/membranes6040052. Membranes (Basel). 2016. PMID: 27983578 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Do biological-based strategies hold promise to biofouling control in MBRs?Water Res. 2013 Oct 1;47(15):5447-63. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.06.033. Epub 2013 Jun 27. Water Res. 2013. PMID: 23863390 Review.
Cited by
-
Differences in the Gut Microbiota Composition and Metabolites Associated With Feeding Intolerance in VLBW Infants With a Gestational Age of ≤ 30 Weeks: A Pilot Study.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Feb 17;12:726322. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.726322. eCollection 2022. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35252022 Free PMC article.
-
The New Antibacterial Properties of the Plants: Quo vadis Studies of Anti-virulence Phytochemicals?Front Microbiol. 2021 May 7;12:667126. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.667126. eCollection 2021. Front Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 34025622 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bioaugmentation with an aerobic denitrifying bacterium with quorum quenching activity for improved nitrogen removal and reduced membrane fouling in anoxic/oxic membrane bioreactor.RSC Adv. 2023 Jan 16;13(4):2345-2354. doi: 10.1039/d2ra06676a. eCollection 2023 Jan 11. RSC Adv. 2023. PMID: 36741184 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources