Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Feb 18;21(1):194.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4123-8.

A prospective double-blinded randomised control trial comparing robotic arm-assisted functionally aligned total knee arthroplasty versus robotic arm-assisted mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty

Babar Kayani  1 , Sujith Konan  2 , Jenni Tahmassebi  2 , Sam Oussedik  2 , Peter D Moriarty  2 , Fares S Haddad  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

A prospective double-blinded randomised control trial comparing robotic arm-assisted functionally aligned total knee arthroplasty versus robotic arm-assisted mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty

Babar Kayani et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with mechanical alignment (MA) aims to achieve neutral limb alignment in all patients, whereas TKA with functional alignment (FA) aims to restore native, patient-specific anatomy and knee kinematics by manipulating bone resections and fine-tuning implant positioning. The objective of this study is to determine the optimal alignment technique in TKA by comparing patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, implant survivorship, complications, and cost-effectiveness in MA TKA versus FA TKA. Robotic technology will be used to execute the planned implant positioning and limb alignment with high-levels of accuracy in all study patients.

Methods and analysis: This prospective double-blinded randomised control trial will include 100 patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary robotic arm-assisted TKA. Following informed consent, patients will be randomised to MA TKA (the control group) or FA TKA (the investigation group) at a ratio of 1:1 using an online random number generator. Blinded observers will review patients at regular intervals for 2 years after surgery to record predefined study outcomes relating to postoperative rehabilitation, clinical progress, functional outcomes, accuracy of implant positioning and limb alignment, gait, implant stability, cost-effectiveness, and complications. A superiority study design will be used to evaluate whether FA TKA provides superior outcomes compared to MA TKA. Primary and secondary objectives will be used to quantify and draw inferences on differences in the efficacy of treatment between the two groups. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol population analysis will be undertaken. The following statistical methods will be employed to analyse the data: descriptive statistics, independent t test, paired t test, analysis of variance, Fisher exact test, chi-square test, and graphical displays. Ethical approval was obtained from the London-Surrey Research Ethics Committee, UK. The study is sponsored by University College London, UK.

Discussion: This is the first study to describe the use of robotic technology to achieve FA TKA, and the only existing clinical trial comparing robotic MA TKA versus robotic FA TKA. The findings of this study will enable an improved understanding of the optimal alignment technique in TKA for achieving high-levels of patient satisfaction, improving functional outcomes, increasing implant survivorship, improving cost-effectiveness, and reducing complications.

Registration: Clinical Trials.gov, NCT04092153. Registered on 17 September 2019.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FSH reports board membership of The Bone and Joint Journal and the Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons, has acted as a consultant for Smith & Nephew, Corin, MatOrtho and Stryker, has received payment for lectures including service on speakers’ bureaus for Smith & Nephew and Stryker, and has received royalties paid by Smith & Nephew, MatOrtho, Corin and Stryker, all outside the submitted work. SK reports consultancy, payment for lectures including service on speakers’ bureaus, payment for development of education presentations and travel/accommodations/meeting expenses for Smith & Nephew and AO, all outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient enrolment flow chart. CT computerised tomography, RSA radiosteriometric analysis, TKA total knee arthroplasty
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments for all study patients. Legend: CT computerised tomography, FA TKA total knee arthroplasty with functional alignment, MA TKA total knee arthroplasty with mechanical alignment
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. National Joint Registry. 16th Annual Report 2019.https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2016th%20Ann.... Date accessed 22 Jan 2020.
    1. Aglietti P, Sensi L, Cuomo P, et al. Rotational position of femoral and tibial components in TKA using the femoral transepicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(11):2751–2755. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0452-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, et al. An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:213–219. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200403000-00030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Almaawi AM, Hutt JRB, Masse V, et al. The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(7):2133–2140. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, et al. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007;89(7):893–900. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19091. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

Grants and funding