Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;34(1):11-16.
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402052. Epub 2020 Feb 15.

Fat Processing Techniques

Erica Y Xue  1 , Luciana Narvaez  1 , Carrie K Chu  2 , Summer E Hanson  2
Affiliations
Review

Fat Processing Techniques

Erica Y Xue et al. Semin Plast Surg. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Autologous fat grafting is an aesthetic and reconstructive procedure in which an individual's own fat is harvested and injected into the soft tissues to correct contour and other abnormalities. Fat graft is considered the ideal soft tissue filler for its biocompatibility, lack of immunogenicity, and availability. The entire procedure of harvesting, processing, and transfer of fat graft affects fat graft take and effectiveness of fat grafting. This article will focus on the most common methods of fat graft processing, including centrifugation, cotton gauze rolling, sedimentation, and filtration/washing. The fragility of the harvested adipocytes makes the technique of fat graft processing of utmost importance, as blood and other unnecessary cellular fragments are removed. Each fat graft processing method has its own merits and shortcomings; however, due to a lack of well-defined prospective studies, there is no evidence to support one processing method as superior to another.

Keywords: ASCs; adipose-derived stem cells; autologous fat grafting; centrifugation; fat graft filtration; fat graft processing; lipoaspirate processing; liposuction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
( A ) Centrifugation system with syringes set up. ( B ) After centrifugation, the resulting lipoaspirate has separate layers, with an oil layer on top that is wicked out, a blood and cell pellet layer at the bottom that is discarded, and variable density fat in the middle that is used for grafting.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
( Left ) Placing the harvested fat onto Telfa. ( Middle ) Removing debris by rolling the harvested fat onto cotton gauze. ( Right ) Placing the processed fat into a syringe for fat injection.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Harvesting fat graft using the Red Head system. The top layer contains variable density fat, whereas the bottom aqueous layer (containing tumescent solution and blood) is drained.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fat graft washing and filtration using the Puregraft ( left ) and REVOLVE ( right ) systems.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Billings E, Jr, May J W., Jr Historical review and present status of free fat graft autotransplantation in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83(02):368–381. - PubMed
    1. Gir P, Brown S A, Oni G, Kashefi N, Mojallal A, Rohrich R J. Fat grafting: evidence-based review on autologous fat harvesting, processing, reinjection, and storage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(01):249–258. - PubMed
    1. Oranges C M, Striebel J, Tremp M, Madduri S, Kalbermatten D F, Schaefer D J. The impact of recipient site external expansion in fat grafting surgical outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(02):e1649. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bellini E, Grieco M P, Raposio E. The science behind autologous fat grafting. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2017;24:65–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rose J G, Jr, Lucarelli M J, Lemke B N et al.Histologic comparison of autologous fat processing methods. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;22(03):195–200. - PubMed