Transanal total mesorectal excision: the Slagelse experience 2013-2019
- PMID: 32072292
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07454-2
Transanal total mesorectal excision: the Slagelse experience 2013-2019
Abstract
Objective: To describe outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) 5 years from implementation at a large-volume colorectal unit, including local recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival.
Background: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a relatively new procedure for mid- and low-rectal cancer, with well-documented safety and feasibility. However, data on long-term results are limited.
Methods: This study was based on a prospective data collection via a maintained database in a large colorectal unit. The database included patients who underwent TaTME from December 2013 through July 2019. We have updated the database through a review of patient charts, including radiology and pathology reports. Data collection included operative details, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, pathologic results, and oncologic results.
Results: During the study period, two hundred patients underwent TaTME in the study period (men = 147). The mean BMI was 26.7%, and the mean tumor height from the anal verge was 7.86 cm. Neoadjuvant treatment was given to 22% of patients. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 9.3% of patients, and the overall rate of postoperative complications was 24.5%. The TME specimen was incomplete in 11% of patients, and the CRM was positive in 5.5% of patients. Local recurrence (LR) occurred in seven patients with a follow-up of at least 2 years (4.7%). Distant metastasis (DM) occurred in 12% of patients. The overall survival was 90% and disease-free survival was 81%. The operating time was reduced in the later period of our experience.
Conclusions: This study showed that TaTME is feasible, safe, and had acceptable short-term outcomes and an acceptable rate of LR. The study included, however, one group that was non-randomized, and the follow-up was not long enough for most patients. Studies with longer follow-up data are awaited.
Keywords: Oncologic results; Rectal cancer surgery; TaTME; Total mesorectal excision.
References
-
- Heald RJ (2013) A new solution to some old problems: transanal TME. Tech Coloproctol 17(3):257–258 - PubMed
-
- Perdawood, S.K. and G.A. Al Khefagie, Transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial experience from Denmark. Colorectal Dis, 2016. 18(1):51–58.
-
- Perdawood SK, Thinggaard BS, Bjoern MX (2018) Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries. Surg Endosc 32(5):2312–2321 - PubMed
-
- Perdawood SK et al (2019) The pattern of defects in mesorectal specimens: is there a difference between transanal and laparoscopic approaches? Scand J Surg 108(1):49–54 - PubMed
-
- Bjoern MX, Nielsen S, Perdawood SK (2019) Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: a comparison of functional outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 23(8):1623–1630 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources