Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr;39(2):97-105.
doi: 10.1007/s10930-020-09884-2.

Covalent Versus Non-covalent Enzyme Inhibition: Which Route Should We Take? A Justification of the Good and Bad from Molecular Modelling Perspective

Affiliations
Review

Covalent Versus Non-covalent Enzyme Inhibition: Which Route Should We Take? A Justification of the Good and Bad from Molecular Modelling Perspective

Aimen Aljoundi et al. Protein J. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

The pace and efficiency of drug target strategies have been emanating debates among researchers in the field of drug development. Covalent inhibitors possess significant advantages over non-covalent inhibitors, such that covalent warheads can target rare residues of a particular target protein, thus leading to the development of highly selective inhibitors. However, toxicity can be a real challenge related to this class of therapeutics. From the challenges of irreversible drug toxicity to the declining reactivity of reversible drugs, herein we provide justifications from the computational point of view. It was evident that both classes had its merits; however, with the increase in drug resistance, covalent inhibition seemed more suitable. There also seems to be enhanced selectivity of the covalent systems, proving its use as a therapeutic regimen worldwide. We believe that this study will assist researchers in making informed decisions on which drug class to choose as lead compounds in the drug discovery pipeline.

Keywords: Covalent inhibition; Merits; Non-covalent inhibition; Pitfalls.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Feb;49(2):377-89 - PubMed
    1. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2013 Mar;27(3):221-34 - PubMed
    1. Clin Ther. 2001 Aug;23(8):1296-310 - PubMed
    1. Future Med Chem. 2018 Oct;10(19):2265-2275 - PubMed
    1. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Nov 27;56(48):15200-15209 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources