Postanesthesia care unit delirium following robot-assisted vs open retropubic radical prostatectomy: A prospective observational study
- PMID: 32073227
- DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2094
Postanesthesia care unit delirium following robot-assisted vs open retropubic radical prostatectomy: A prospective observational study
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of early postoperative delirium in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in the extreme Trendelenburg position and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP) in supine position.
Methods: Patients were screened for delirium signs 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes following extubation.
Results: PACU delirium was present in 39.3% of RARP (64/163) patients and 41.8% of ORP (77/184) patients. Higher age (OR 1.072, 95%CI: 1.034-1.111, P < .001), total intravenous anesthesia (OR 2.001, 95%CI: 1.243-3.221, P = .004), and anesthesia duration (OR 1.255, 95%CI: 1.067-1.476, P = .006) were associated with PACU delirium, but no association was found between surgical technique and PACU delirium.
Conclusion: Compared with inhalational anesthesia, total intravenous anesthesia using propofol-sufentanil, higher age, and longer duration of anesthesia were associated with PACU delirium. Based on these findings, adverse effects on postoperative recovery and delirium signs do not have to be considered in the choice of surgical approach for radical prostatectomy.
Trial registration: https://www.drks.de/, identifier: DRKS00010014.
Keywords: Trendelenburg position; anesthesia; postoperative delirium; postoperative neurocognitive disorders; radical prostatectomy.
© 2020 The Authors. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate Cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2017;71(4):618-629.
-
- Haese A, Knipper S, Isbarn H, et al. A comparative study of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in 10 790 men treated by highly trained surgeons for both procedures. BJU Int. 2019;123(6):1031-1040.
-
- Rush S, Alibhai SMH, Xu L, et al. Health-related quality of life in robotic versus open radical prostatectomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(5-6):179-187.
-
- Wallerstedt A, Tyritzis SI, Thorsteinsdottir T, et al. Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2015;67(4):660-670.
-
- Yaxley JW, Coughlin GD, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet. 2016;388(10049):1057-1066.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
