Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 14;10(2):103.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10020103.

Breast Cancer Detection-A Synopsis of Conventional Modalities and the Potential Role of Microwave Imaging

Affiliations
Review

Breast Cancer Detection-A Synopsis of Conventional Modalities and the Potential Role of Microwave Imaging

Brian M Moloney et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Global statistics have demonstrated that breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed invasive cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among female patients. Survival following a diagnosis of breast cancer is grossly determined by the stage of the disease at the time of initial diagnosis, highlighting the importance of early detection. Improving early diagnosis will require a multi-faceted approach to optimizing the use of currently available imaging modalities and investigating new methods of detection. The application of microwave technologies in medical diagnostics is an emerging field of research, with breast cancer detection seeing the most significant progress in the last twenty years. In this review, the application of current conventional imaging modalities is discussed, and recurrent shortcomings highlighted. Microwave imaging is rapid and inexpensive. If the preliminary results of its diagnostic capacity are substantiated, microwave technology may offer a non-ionizing, non-invasive, and painless adjunct or stand-alone modality that could possibly be implemented in routine diagnostic breast care.

Keywords: breast cancer; breast imaging; microwave breast imaging; multimodal imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screening process flow sheet and timescales for the BreastCheck screening program.

References

    1. Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Dikshit R., Eser S., Mathers C., Rebelo M., Parkin D.M., Forman D., Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer. 2015;136:E359–E386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feuer EJ., Wun L.M., Boring C.C., Flanders W.D., Timmel M.J., Tong T. The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1993;85:892–897. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.11.892. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levi F., Bosetti C., Lucchini F., Negri E., La Vecchia C. Monitoring the decrease in breast cancer mortality in Europe. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2005;14:497–502. doi: 10.1097/00008469-200512000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Myers E.R., Moorman P., Gierisch J.M., Havrilesky L.J., Grimm L.J., Ghate S., Davidson B., Mongtomery R.C., Crowley M.J., McCrory D.C., et al. Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2015;314:1615–1634. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13183. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2016;66:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources