Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 19;17(1):25.
doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00663-9.

The exoskeleton expansion: improving walking and running economy

Gregory S Sawicki  1   2   3 , Owen N Beck  4   5 , Inseung Kang  4 , Aaron J Young  6   7
Affiliations
Review

The exoskeleton expansion: improving walking and running economy

Gregory S Sawicki et al. J Neuroeng Rehabil. .

Abstract

Since the early 2000s, researchers have been trying to develop lower-limb exoskeletons that augment human mobility by reducing the metabolic cost of walking and running versus without a device. In 2013, researchers finally broke this 'metabolic cost barrier'. We analyzed the literature through December 2019, and identified 23 studies that demonstrate exoskeleton designs that improved human walking and running economy beyond capable without a device. Here, we reviewed these studies and highlighted key innovations and techniques that enabled these devices to surpass the metabolic cost barrier and steadily improve user walking and running economy from 2013 to nearly 2020. These studies include, physiologically-informed targeting of lower-limb joints; use of off-board actuators to rapidly prototype exoskeleton controllers; mechatronic designs of both active and passive systems; and a renewed focus on human-exoskeleton interface design. Lastly, we highlight emerging trends that we anticipate will further augment wearable-device performance and pose the next grand challenges facing exoskeleton technology for augmenting human mobility.

Keywords: Assistive devices; Augmentation; Economy; Energetic; Metabolic cost; Run; Walk; Wearable robotics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Milestones illustrating the advancement of exoskeleton technology. Tethered (blue) and autonomous (red) exoskeletons assisting at the ankle (circle), knee (triangle), and hip (square) joint to improve healthy, natural walking (left) and running (right) economy versus using no device are shown
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The year that each exoskeleton study was published versus the change in net metabolic cost versus walking or running without using the respective device. Red indicates autonomous and blue indicates a tethered exoskeletons. Different symbols indicate the leg joint(s) that each device directly targets. Asterisk indicates special case and cross indicates a passive exoskeleton
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ferris DP. The exoskeletons are here. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herr H. Exoskeletons and orthoses: classification, design challenges and future directions. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beneke R, Meyer K. Walking performance and economy in chronic heart failure patients pre and post exercise training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;75(3):246–251. - PubMed
    1. Hoogkamer W, et al. Altered running economy directly translates to altered distance-running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(11):2175–2180. - PubMed
    1. Newman AB, et al. Association of long-distance corridor walk performance with mortality, cardiovascular disease, mobility limitation, and disability. JAMA. 2006;295(17):2018–2026. - PubMed

Publication types