Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;9(1):e000826.
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000826.

What do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? An interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare

Affiliations

What do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? An interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare

Romana Fattimah Malik et al. BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: A toxic organisational culture (OC) is a major contributing factor to serious failings in healthcare delivery. Poor OC with its consequences of unprofessional behaviour, unsafe attitudes of professionals and its impact on patient care still need to be addressed. Although various tools have been developed to determine OC and improve patient safety, it remains a challenge to decide on the suitability of tools for uncovering the underlying factors which truly impact OC, such as behavioural norms, or the unwritten rules. A better understanding of the underlying dimensions that these tools do and do not unravel is required.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to provide an overview of existing tools to assess OC and the tangible and intangible OC dimensions these tools address.

Methods: An interpretive umbrella review was conducted. Literature reviews were considered for inclusion if they described multiple tools and their dimensional characteristics in the context of OC, organisational climate, patient safety culture or climate. OC tools and the underlying dimensions were extracted from the reviews. A qualitative data analysis software program (MAX.QDA 2007) was used for coding the dimensions, which resulted in tangible and intangible themes.

Results: Fifteen reviews met our inclusion criteria. A total of 127 tools were identified, which were mainly quantitative questionnaires covering tangible key dimensions. Qualitative analyses distinguished nine intangible themes (commitment, trust, psychological safety, power, support, communication openness, blame and shame, morals and valuing ethics, and cohesion) and seven tangible themes (leadership, communication system, teamwork, training and development, organisational structures and processes, employee and job attributes, and patient orientation).

Conclusion: This umbrella review identifies the essential tangible and intangible themes of OC tools. OC tools in healthcare do not seem to be designed to determine deeper underlying dimensions of culture. We suggest approaching complex underlying OC problems by focusing on the intangible dimensions, rather than putting the tangible dimensions up front.

Keywords: communication; health policy; leadership; organisational culture; patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Tangible and intangible themes of organisational culture (OC) tools.

References

    1. Zembla - Onderzoeksjournalistiek. Available: https://zembla.bnnvara.nl/pagina/special-ziekenhuiscalamiteiten
    1. Campbell D, Weaver M. Doctors at West Suffolk hospital 'too scared' to report safety issues. The Guardian 11-12-2019.
    1. Lintern S. ‘Largest maternity scandal in NHS history’: Dozens of mothers and babies died on wards of hospital trust, leaked report reveals. Independent 2019 2019:19–11.
    1. Marsh S. Bullying and sexual harassment 'endemic' in NHS hospitals. The Guardian 2019:24–2.
    1. Scott T, Mannion R, Marshall M, et al. . Does organisational culture influence health care performance? A review of the evidence. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003;8:105–17. 10.1258/135581903321466085 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms