Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Feb 19;10(1):2983.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59830-6.

Characteristics and outcomes of bacteremia among ICU-admitted patients with severe sepsis

Collaborators, Affiliations
Comparative Study

Characteristics and outcomes of bacteremia among ICU-admitted patients with severe sepsis

Akira Komori et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The clinical implications of bacteremia among septic patients remain unclear, although a vast amount of data have been accumulated on sepsis. We aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of severe sepsis patients with and without bacteremia. This secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study included 59 intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan between January 2016 and March 2017. The study cohort comprised 1,184 adults (aged ≥ 16 years) who were admitted to an ICU with severe sepsis and diagnosed according to the Sepsis-2 criteria. Of 1,167 patients included in the analysis, 636 (54.5%) had bacteremia. Those with bacteremia had significantly higher rates of septic shock (66.4% vs. 58.9%, p = 0.01) and higher sepsis severity scores, including the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was seen between patients with and without bacteremia (25.6% vs. 21.0%, p = 0.08). In conclusion, half of severe sepsis patients in ICUs have bacteremia. Although patients with bacteremia had more severe state, between-group differences in patient-centered outcomes, such as in-hospital mortality, have not been fully elucidated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Kempker JA, Martin GS. The changing epidemiology and definitions of sepsis. Clin. Chest Med. 2016;37:165–179. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.01.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bone RC, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Chest. 1992;101:1644–1655. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Crit. Care Med. 2017;45:486–552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rangel-Frausto MS, et al. The natural history of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). A prospective study. JAMA. 1995;273:117–123. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03520260039030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jeganathan N, et al. The characteristics and impact of source of infection on sepsis-related ICU outcomes. J. Crit. Care. 2017;41:170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.019. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms