How to ask about the use of new psychoactive substances to increase the validity of results in self-report prevalence surveys
- PMID: 32078202
- DOI: 10.1111/dar.13036
How to ask about the use of new psychoactive substances to increase the validity of results in self-report prevalence surveys
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum.Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020 Sep;39(6):774. doi: 10.1111/dar.13141. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020. PMID: 33463841 No abstract available.
Abstract
Introduction and aims: New psychoactive substances (NPS) represent hundreds of novel compounds. However, the general public might not be familiar with the overarching term NPS. This can result in both under- and over-reporting of NPS use.
Design and methods: The study analysed the last-year prevalence of NPS use in an online survey conducted across I-TREND project countries (the Czech Republic, the Netherlands and Poland). Self-reported NPS use was assessed within two types of questions-a generic and a checklist question. We analysed prevalence for each question separately, incorporated the free-text probe 'other' that followed them, and combined the two questions into a conservative and an inclusive estimate.
Results: Including free-text responses to the 'other' categories increased prevalence of NPS use (from 51% to 56% for the checklist question and 25% to 32% for the generic question). Taking an inclusive approach to estimating prevalence (i.e. indicating NPS use in either a generic list or from the checklist) yielded a higher prevalence estimate (60%, 95% confidence interval 58-62%), compared to a more conservative approach in which NPS use had to be affirmed by both questions (27%, 95% confidence interval 26-29%).
Discussion and conclusions: Generic questions might lead to notably lower estimates of self-reported NPS use in comparison to checklists. However, creating relevant checklists is challenging and lengthy survey instruments have limitations. Further surveys might benefit from featuring a combination of the strategies used in this study-a single (generic) question involving a number of locally specific NPSs and a free-text 'other' probe.
Keywords: NPS checklist; new psychoactive substances; online survey; self-reported prevalence; validity.
© 2020 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.
References
-
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. The challenge of new psychoactive substances. [Internet]. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2013 Available at: https://www.unodc.org/documents/scientific/NPS_2013_SMART.pdf.
-
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. European drug report 2017: trends and developments [Internet]. Luxembourg: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, 2017 Available at: http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/4541/TDAT17001ENN.pdf.
-
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Early-warning system on new psychoactive substances - operating guidelines. [Internet]. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2007 Available at: http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/attachements.cfm/att_52451_EN_EWSguidelines2....
-
- European Council. Council decision 2005/387/JHA of 10 may 2005 on the information exchange, risk-assessment and control of new psychoactive substances [internet]. Council of the European Union, Official journal of the European Union, L 127/32, 2005. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32005D0387.
-
- I-TREND. Popular NPS [Internet]. 2019. Available at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=w... (accessed 20 September 2002).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
