Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 17;20(4):1096.
doi: 10.3390/s20041096.

A Review of Data Analytic Applications in Road Traffic Safety. Part 2: Prescriptive Modeling

Affiliations
Review

A Review of Data Analytic Applications in Road Traffic Safety. Part 2: Prescriptive Modeling

Qiong Hu et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

In the first part of the review, we observed that there exists a significant gap between the predictive and prescriptive models pertaining to crash risk prediction and minimization, respectively. In this part, we review and categorize the optimization/ prescriptive analytic models that focus on minimizing crash risk. Although the majority of works in this segment of the literature are related to the hazardous materials (hazmat) trucking problems, we show that (with some exceptions) many can also be utilized in non-hazmat scenarios. In an effort to highlight the effect of crash risk prediction model on the accumulated risk obtained from the prescriptive model, we present a simulated example where we utilize four risk indicators (obtained from logistic regression, Poisson regression, XGBoost, and neural network) in the k-shortest path algorithm. From our example, we demonstrate two major designed takeaways: (a) the shortest path may not always result in the lowest crash risk, and (b) a similarity in overall predictive performance may not always translate to similar outcomes from the prescriptive models. Based on the review and example, we highlight several avenues for future research.

Keywords: crash risk modeling; hazardous materials; highway safety; operations research; prescriptive analytics; shortest path problem; trucking; vehicle routing problem.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Concordance of four models for evaluating the risk of crash. Darker color indicates higher crash risk.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The results of the k-shortest path algorithm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zohar D., Huang Y.H., Lee J., Robertson M.M. Testing extrinsic and intrinsic motivation as explanatory variables for the safety climate–safety performance relationship among long-haul truck drivers. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2015;30:84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.01.014. - DOI
    1. Crum M.R., Morrow P.C. The influence of carrier scheduling practices on truck driver fatigue. Transp. J. 2002;42:20–41.
    1. Crizzle A.M., Bigelow P., Adams D., Gooderham S., Myers A.M., Thiffault P. Health and wellness of long-haul truck and bus drivers: A systematic literature review and directions for future research. J. Transp. Health. 2017;7:90–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2017.05.359. - DOI
    1. Commercial Motor Vehicle: Traffic Safety Facts. U.S. Department of Transportation. [(accessed on 28 April 2018)];2017 Available online: https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/sites/fmcsa.dot.gov/files/docs/safety/data-and....
    1. Table VM-1-Highway Statistics 2016-Policy|Federal Highway Administration. U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Highway Policy Information. [(accessed on 28 April 2018)];2017 Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2016/vm1.cfm.

LinkOut - more resources