Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 20;20(3):9.
doi: 10.1007/s11892-020-1293-4.

Evidence and Challenges for Translation and Population Impact of the Diabetes Prevention Program

Affiliations
Review

Evidence and Challenges for Translation and Population Impact of the Diabetes Prevention Program

Ronald T Ackermann et al. Curr Diab Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Type 2 diabetes is common, burdensome, and preventable. Landmark trials such as the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) demonstrated that resource-intensive lifestyle support interventions resulting in modest weight loss via healthy diet changes and physical activity can lower the rate of diabetes development by 58%. We performed a review of efforts to translate and implement DPP-like programs throughout the USA to identify challenges and opportunities for improvement.

Recent findings: For more than a decade, multiple stakeholders have worked to translate evidence-based principles of diabetes prevention to reach 84 million Americans with prediabetes. DPP-like programs have been delivered by over 1500 organizations, reaching almost 300,000 people, but this number represents less than 1% of the target population. Research has uncovered large gaps in efforts to diagnose, raise awareness, and provide access to DPP-like programs for adults with prediabetes, requiring further stakeholder engagement and coordination to resolve. Efforts to address prevailing gaps in diabetes prevention must address distinct and sometimes conflicting priorities and concerns of stakeholders. Our review recommends several areas of further research and action to improve type 2 diabetes prevention on a population scale.

Keywords: Diabetes prevention; Dissemination of evidence; Implementation challenges; Prediabetes; Type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Ronald T. Ackermann and Matthew J. O’Brien each declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Nature of gaps leading to low overall participation in DPP-like programs nationally. (Figure created with data from references [9, 11])

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Centers for Diseaese Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistical Report Atlanta, GA, USA: Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2017. [Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics/statistics-report.html.]
    1. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002;346(6):393–403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pan XR, Li GW, Hu YH, Wang JX, Yang WY, An ZX, et al. Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(4):537–44. - PubMed
    1. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Mary S, Mukesh B, Bhaskar AD, Vijay V, et al. The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1). Diabetologia. 2006;49(2):289–97. - PubMed
    1. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hamalainen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001;344(18):1343–50. - PubMed