Reliability of Human Lumbar Facet Joint Degeneration Severity Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- PMID: 32081513
- PMCID: PMC7200266
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.027
Reliability of Human Lumbar Facet Joint Degeneration Severity Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of the assessment of lumbar facet joint degeneration severity by analyzing degeneration subscales using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in human participants.
Methods: The reliability of articular cartilage degeneration, subchondral bone sclerosis, and osteophyte formation subscales of lumbar facet joint degeneration severity was assessed in MRI images from n = 10 human participants. Each scale was applied to n = 20 lumbar facet joints (L4/5 level). Three examiners were trained. A first assessment of MRI images was provided by the examiners followed by a second assessment 30 days later. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were determined using percent agreement, the weighted kappa coefficient κw for paired comparisons, and the overall weighted kappa κo. The minimum threshold for reliability was set at moderate levels of agreement, κw > 0.40, based upon previous recommendations.
Results: The articular cartilage subscale had acceptable intraobserver (κo = 0.51) and interobserver (κo = 0.41) reliability. Scales for subchondral bone sclerosis (intraobserver κo = 0.28; interobserver κo = 0.10) and osteophyte formation (intraobserver κo = 0.26; interobserver κo = 0.20) did not achieve acceptable reliability.
Conclusion: Of the 3 subcategories of lumbar facet joint degeneration, only articular cartilage degeneration demonstrated acceptable reliability. Subscales of lumbar facet joint degeneration should be considered independently for reliability before combining subscales for a global degeneration score. Owing to the inherent difficulty of assessing lumbar facet joint degeneration, the use of multiple examiners independently assessing degeneration with reliable scales and then coming to a consensus score upon any disagreements is recommended for future clinical studies.
Keywords: Diagnostic Imaging; Facet Joint; Lumbar Spine; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Osteoarthritis; Reliability; Zygapophyseal Joint.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures

References
-
- Lee JC, Cha JG, Yoo JH, Kim HK, Kim HJ, Shin BJ. Radiographic grading of facet degeneration, is it reliable? - a comparison of MR or CT grading with histologic grading in lumbar fusion candidates. Spine J 2012;12(6):507–14; doi:S1529-9430(12)00427-5 [pii] 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.06.003. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Boos N, Hodler J. MR imaging and CT in osteoarthritis of the lumbar facet joints. Skeletal Radiol 1999;28(4):215–9. - PubMed
-
- Kettler A, Wilke HJ. Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2006;15(6):705–18; doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0954-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical