Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2019 Sep;11(3):251-256.

Intrauterine device (IUD) migration in cesarean delivery scar: What to do with the niche?

Affiliations
Case Reports

Intrauterine device (IUD) migration in cesarean delivery scar: What to do with the niche?

A Verest et al. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The presence of a niche after cesarean section is a common and mostly asymptomatic finding. However, it can cause symptoms or result in impaired fertility or obstetric complications in following pregnancies. At present there is no uniform consensus on when to treat and which way of repair is most suitable. The aim of this systematic review of literature was to provide an overview of current knowledge about cesarean scar niches and about the modalities of niche repair.

Methods: On the second of January 2019 Pubmed and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies published until December 2018. Search terms were cesarean scar defect, niche, niche repair. As combination key words `hysteroscopy ´, `laparoscopy ´ and `vaginal repair ´ were used.

Results: Eight articles were included in this review. The publications were very heterogeneous. Most of them stated that hysteroscopic niche repair with resection of the lower (and upper) rim is suggested for abnormal uterine bleeding. In symptomatic women who wish to conceive, different authors suggest laparoscopic niche repair with double layer closure to increase myometrial thickness. Also, one report on vaginal repair was included, none of the included patients had child wish. Nothing was reported on residual myometrial thickness after surgery.

Conclusion: The current literature is not sufficient to draw strong conclusions on what to do about cesarean scar niches, yet, they justify the role of hysteroscopic as well as laparoscopic niche repair dependent on different pre- operative factors. We conclude that further large randomized controlled trials are necessary.

Keywords: Cesarean scar defect; IUD; hysteroscopy; laparoscopy; niche repair; residual myometrium.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
— Figure 1a-1b: Ultrasound of the uterus: Uterus in anteversionflexion. Isthmocoele located in the anterior wall, free fluid in the cavity. IUD positioned in the isthmocoele. b: schematic drawing of uterus with IUD migrated into isthmocoele.
Figure 2
Figure 2
— Above: IUD located in the isthmocoele. Below: Border between isthmocoele (A) and uterine cavity (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
— Flow diagram of the literature search.

References

    1. Bij de Vaate AJ, Brolmann HA, van der Voet LF, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:93–99. - PubMed
    1. Bij de Vaate AJ, van der Voet LF, Naji O, et al. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(4):372–382. - PubMed
    1. Donnez O, Donnez J, Orellana R, et al. Gynecological and obstetrical outcomes after laparoscopic repair of a caesarean scar defect in a series of 38 women. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(1):289–296. - PubMed
    1. Fabres C, Arriagada P, Fernandez C, et al. Surgical treatment and follow-up of women with intermenstrual bleeding due to caesarean section scar defect. J Minim Invasive Gynaecol. 2005;12(1):25–28. - PubMed
    1. Florio P, Filippeschi M, Moncini I, et al. Hysteroscopic treatment of the caesarean-induced isthomocele in restoring infertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24(3):180–186. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources