Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2020 Jan 28:2020:8163620.
doi: 10.1155/2020/8163620. eCollection 2020.

Skin Testing to Identify Safe Drugs for Patients with Rocuronium-Induced Anaphylaxis

Affiliations
Case Reports

Skin Testing to Identify Safe Drugs for Patients with Rocuronium-Induced Anaphylaxis

Manzo Suzuki et al. Case Rep Anesthesiol. .

Abstract

Among patients who develop anaphylaxis during anesthesia, anaphylaxis caused by a neuromuscular blocking agent has the highest incidence. In patients who developed IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, and cross-reactivity among NMBAs is a concern in subsequent anesthetic procedures. We present a patient who developed rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis in whom the skin prick test (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT) could identify a safe drug to use in the subsequent anesthetic procedure. A 32-year-old female developed anaphylactic shock at the induction of general anesthesia. She recovered by administration of hydrocortisone and epinephrine. Skin tests including the SPT followed by the IDT revealed rocuronium as the drug that caused anaphylaxis and vecuronium as a safe drug to use for the subsequent general anesthesia. She safely underwent surgery with general anesthesia using vecuronium one month after the skin testing. There are not many reports on the effectiveness of the SPT followed by IDT in identifying the causative drug as well as a safe drug to use in the subsequent anesthetic procedure following anaphylaxis during anesthesia. The usefulness of the SPT should be re-evaluated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Ebo D. G., Fisher M. M., Hagendorens M. M., Bridts C. H., Stevens W. J. Anaphylaxis during anaesthesia: diagnostic approach. Allergy. 2007;62(5):471–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01347.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mertes P. M., Alla F., Tréchot P., Auroy Y., Jougla E. Anaphylaxis during anesthesia in France: an 8-year national survey. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2011;128(2):366–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.03.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chiriac A. M., Tacquard C., Fadhel N. B., et al. Safety of subsequent general anaesthesia in patients allergic to neuromuscular blocking agents: value of allergy skin testing. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2018;120(6):1437–1440. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heier T., Guttormsen A. B. Anaphylactic reactions during induction of anaesthesia using rocuronium for muscle relaxation: a report including 3 cases. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2000;44(7):775–781. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440702.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reddy J. I., Cooke P. J., van Schalkwyk J. M., Hannam J. A., Fitzharris P., Mitchell S. J. Anaphylaxis is more common with rocuronium and succinylcholine than with atracurium. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(1):39–45. doi: 10.1097/aln.0000000000000512. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources